<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
  <title>The Geopolitical Economist · Camilo Flora Matsumbo</title>
  <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/authors/camilo-flora-matsumbo</link>
  <atom:link href="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/authors/camilo-flora-matsumbo.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
  <description>Camilo Flora Matsumbo is a Mozambican researcher and economic analyst who writes on public finance, debt sustainability, political economy and economic development in Africa and globally.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  
  <item>
    <title>The Congo&#x27;s Cobalt Export Ban Looks Like a Sovereignty Move. Its Own Design Says Otherwise.</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/congo-cobalt-export-ban-quota-sovereignty</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/congo-cobalt-export-ban-quota-sovereignty</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Camilo Flora Matsumbo</dc:creator>
    <description>This analysis examines whether the DRC’s cobalt export restrictions represent genuine resource sovereignty or primarily expanded regulatory control. It argues that the 2025 quota system largely preserved the dominance of foreign-owned producers because its base allocation relied on historical export shares. While the state gained greater discretion over export rights in 2026, the clearest fiscal benefit still comes through existing mining royalties, rather than a substantial redistribution of cobalt rents.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/congo-cobalt-export-ban-quota-sovereignty.jpg" length="223864" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/congo-cobalt-export-ban-quota-sovereignty.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

The Congo's Cobalt Export Ban Looks Like a Sovereignty Move. Its Own Design Says Otherwise.

Congo's cobalt quotas follow 2022–24 exports, locking in CMOC and Glencore. The state's surest gain is a 10% royalty.

This analysis examines whether the DRC’s cobalt export restrictions represent genuine resource sovereignty or primarily expanded regulatory control. It argues that the 2025 quota system largely preserved the dominance of foreign-owned producers because its base allocation relied on historical export shares. While the state gained greater discretion over export rights in 2026, the clearest fiscal benefit still comes through existing mining royalties, rather than a substantial redistribution of cobalt rents.

From the opening:
“The Democratic Republic of the Congo produced an estimated 75 percent of the world's mined cobalt in 2024, according to the United States Geological Survey's National Minerals Information Center, a concentration of supply that gives the country a market position few commodity producers anywhere possess.”

By Camilo Flora Matsumbo, Researcher and economic analyst, Mozambique

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/congo-cobalt-export-ban-quota-sovereignty

#Geopolitics #Africa #China #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Africa</category>
    <category>Indo-Pacific</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The Lobito Corridor Isn&#x27;t an Alternative to China&#x27;s Railway. It&#x27;s China&#x27;s Railway, Re-engineered for a Western Strategic Era.</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/lobito-corridor-chinas-railway-re-engineered</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/lobito-corridor-chinas-railway-re-engineered</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Camilo Flora Matsumbo</dc:creator>
    <description>The Lobito Corridor is widely described as the West&#x27;s infrastructure answer to China in Africa&#x27;s critical minerals race. This analysis finds a more precise pattern: the railway&#x27;s physical core was rebuilt by Chinese financing and contractors between 2006 and 2015, and what the United States, the European Union and regional development banks have financed since 2022 is the operating concession and modernization of that existing line, not a newly built alternative. The one genuinely new piece, a Zambia-Angola extension, has fallen behind its own timeline, while China has already signed a comparable concession to modernize its own competing corridor.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/lobito-corridor-chinas-railway-re-engineered.jpg" length="231751" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/lobito-corridor-chinas-railway-re-engineered.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

The Lobito Corridor Isn't an Alternative to China's Railway. It's China's Railway, Re-engineered for a Western Strategic Era.

The Lobito Corridor runs on a China-rebuilt railway. Western money bought its concession and upgrade; the new line is unbuilt.

The Lobito Corridor is widely described as the West's infrastructure answer to China in Africa's critical minerals race. This analysis finds a more precise pattern: the railway's physical core was rebuilt by Chinese financing and contractors between 2006 and 2015, and what the United States, the European Union and regional development banks have financed since 2022 is the operating concession and modernization of that existing line, not a newly built alternative. The one genuinely new piece, a Zambia-Angola extension, has fallen behind its own timeline, while China has already signed a comparable concession to modernize its own competing corridor.

From the opening:
“The Lobito Corridor is routinely described as Washington and Brussels' answer to China's Belt and Road Initiative in Africa, a Western funded alternative route for critical minerals that bypasses Chinese controlled infrastructure.”

By Camilo Flora Matsumbo, Researcher and economic analyst, Mozambique

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/lobito-corridor-chinas-railway-re-engineered

#Geopolitics #Africa #China #UnitedStates #Zambia #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Africa</category>
    <category>Indo-Pacific</category>
    <category>Americas</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The Sahel Didn&#x27;t Replace France. It Unbundled It.</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/the-sahel-did-not-replace-france-it-unbundled-it</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/the-sahel-did-not-replace-france-it-unbundled-it</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Camilo Flora Matsumbo</dc:creator>
    <description>Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger are often described as having swapped France for Russia. The record shows something narrower: the security layer of France&#x27;s presence was replaced quickly, through Wagner and Turkish drones, while the development finance, monetary architecture and institutional access that came with it were not replaced at comparable scale by anyone.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/the-sahel-did-not-replace-france-it-unbundled-it.jpg" length="187954" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/the-sahel-did-not-replace-france-it-unbundled-it.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

THE SAHEL DIDN'T REPLACE FRANCE. IT UNBUNDLED IT.

Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger swapped French troops for Wagner and Turkish drones. Development finance, the CFA franc and institutional access were not replaced.

From the opening:
“Between March 2022 and December 2023, military governments in Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger forced the complete withdrawal of French troops, ending more than a decade of direct French security involvement in the central Sahel.”

By Camilo Flora Matsumbo, Researcher and economic analyst, Mozambique

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/the-sahel-did-not-replace-france-it-unbundled-it

#Geopolitics #Africa #Russia #Europe #Mali #BurkinaFaso]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Africa</category>
    <category>Russia &amp; Eurasia</category>
    <category>Europe</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The G20 Common Framework Fixed Who Sits at the Table. It Never Fixed the Clock.</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/g20-common-framework-fixed-the-table-not-the-clock</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/g20-common-framework-fixed-the-table-not-the-clock</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Camilo Flora Matsumbo</dc:creator>
    <description>The Common Framework brought China and the Paris Club into one restructuring process for the first time. It left the timeline open-ended, and the IMF and World Bank have since called the missing standstill and deadline design gaps. The delay, not the generosity of each settlement, has been its most underpriced cost.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/g20-common-framework-fixed-the-table-not-the-clock.jpg" length="320820" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/g20-common-framework-fixed-the-table-not-the-clock.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

The G20 Common Framework Fixed Who Sits at the Table. It Never Fixed the Clock.

Chad, Zambia, Ghana and Ethiopia waited one to three years for restructuring under the G20 Common Framework. The delay, not the terms, is its biggest cost.

The Common Framework brought China and the Paris Club into one restructuring process for the first time. It left the timeline open-ended, and the IMF and World Bank have since called the missing standstill and deadline design gaps. The delay, not the generosity of each settlement, has been its most underpriced cost.

From the opening:
“Nearly six years after the Group of Twenty created the Common Framework for Debt Treatment in November 2020, the mechanism has produced a real and underappreciated achievement: for the first time, it placed the Paris Club of traditional bilateral creditors and China, now the largest single bilateral creditor to many…”

By Camilo Flora Matsumbo, Researcher and economic analyst, Mozambique

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/g20-common-framework-fixed-the-table-not-the-clock

#Geopolitics #Africa #China #Zambia #Ghana #Ethiopia]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Africa</category>
    <category>Indo-Pacific</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The Price Cap Didn&#x27;t Stop Russian Oil. It Created a Toll Booth.</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/russian-oil-price-cap-shadow-fleet-toll-booth</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/russian-oil-price-cap-shadow-fleet-toll-booth</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Camilo Flora Matsumbo</dc:creator>
    <description>The price cap was meant to cut Russia&#x27;s revenue while keeping its oil on the market. Its enforcement built a parallel shipping system whose costs are shared unevenly by exporters, shipowners, insurers, traders and refiners.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/russian-oil-price-cap-shadow-fleet-toll-booth.jpg" length="209873" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/russian-oil-price-cap-shadow-fleet-toll-booth.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

THE PRICE CAP DIDN'T STOP RUSSIAN OIL. IT CREATED A TOLL BOOTH.

The G7 price cap kept Russian oil flowing but spawned a shadow fleet that taxes every barrel along the way. Who pays the toll?

The price cap was meant to cut Russia's revenue while keeping its oil on the market. Its enforcement built a parallel shipping system whose costs are shared unevenly by exporters, shipowners, insurers, traders and refiners.

From the opening:
“Nearly four years after the Group of Seven, the European Union and Australia imposed a price cap on Russian seaborne crude, that oil is still reaching global markets largely as before. This is not, by itself, evidence that the policy failed. The U.S.”

By Camilo Flora Matsumbo, Researcher and economic analyst, Mozambique

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/russian-oil-price-cap-shadow-fleet-toll-booth

#Geopolitics #Russia #Europe #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Russia &amp; Eurasia</category>
    <category>Europe</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The UAE Doesn&#x27;t Buy Africa&#x27;s Goods. It Buys the Gates.</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/uae-africa-ports-gold-gates</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/uae-africa-ports-gold-gates</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Camilo Flora Matsumbo</dc:creator>
    <description>Emirati influence in Africa is better measured by position than by pledges: ports, gold markets and farmland place the UAE at the points where African goods change jurisdiction or form.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/uae-africa-ports-gold-gates.jpg" length="281520" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/uae-africa-ports-gold-gates.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

THE UAE DOESN'T BUY AFRICA'S GOODS. IT BUYS THE GATES.

Emirati influence in Africa is measured by position, not pledges: the ports, gold hub and land where value is captured.

From the opening:
“The usual way to measure Gulf money in Africa is by the size of the pledge: so many billions announced, so many projects signed. That is the wrong unit. The more revealing measure is position.”

By Camilo Flora Matsumbo, Researcher and economic analyst, Mozambique

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/uae-africa-ports-gold-gates

#Geopolitics #Africa #MiddleEast #UAE #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Africa</category>
    <category>Middle East &amp; North Africa</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Egypt Didn&#x27;t Fix Its Foreign Currency Problem. It Rented a Solution.</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/egypt-ras-el-hekma-suez-foreign-currency</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/egypt-ras-el-hekma-suez-foreign-currency</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Camilo Flora Matsumbo</dc:creator>
    <description>The $35 billion Ras El-Hekma deal with the UAE, not structural reform alone, most immediately eased Egypt&#x27;s foreign-exchange crisis, arriving just as Houthi attacks collapsed Suez Canal revenue.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/egypt-ras-el-hekma-suez-foreign-currency.jpg" length="195508" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/egypt-ras-el-hekma-suez-foreign-currency.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

EGYPT DIDN'T FIX ITS FOREIGN CURRENCY PROBLEM. IT RENTED A SOLUTION.

A $35bn land deal eased Egypt's currency crisis just as Suez revenue collapsed. Has its capacity to earn dollars recovered?

The $35 billion Ras El-Hekma deal with the UAE, not structural reform alone, most immediately eased Egypt's foreign-exchange crisis, arriving just as Houthi attacks collapsed Suez Canal revenue.

From the opening:
“Egypt's economic improvement since 2024, reflected in faster growth, sharply lower inflation and rebuilt reserves, is often described as the payoff from a hard, IMF-backed reform program. Much of that improvement reflects genuine adjustment and reform.”

By Camilo Flora Matsumbo, Researcher and economic analyst, Mozambique

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/egypt-ras-el-hekma-suez-foreign-currency

#Geopolitics #Africa #MiddleEast #Egypt #UAE #Suez]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Africa</category>
    <category>Middle East &amp; North Africa</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The Global South&#x27;s Financial Alternative Isn&#x27;t the One With BRICS on the Door</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/global-south-financial-alternative-papss-brics</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/global-south-financial-alternative-papss-brics</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Camilo Flora Matsumbo</dc:creator>
    <description>Africa&#x27;s most consequential break from dependence on external financial intermediaries is not the BRICS-led New Development Bank, but the Pan-African Payment and Settlement System, a homegrown initiative moving money across African currencies without routing it through a third one.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/global-south-financial-alternative-papss-brics.jpg" length="217194" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/global-south-financial-alternative-papss-brics.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

The Global South's Financial Alternative Isn't the One With BRICS on the Door

Africa's fastest break from external financial intermediaries is a homegrown payment system, not the BRICS bank.

Africa's most consequential break from dependence on external financial intermediaries is not the BRICS-led New Development Bank, but the Pan-African Payment and Settlement System, a homegrown initiative moving money across African currencies without routing it through a third one.

From the opening:
“When African finance ministers talk about escaping the IMF and the World Bank, most of the international coverage points to BRICS: to the bloc's New Development Bank, to talk of de-dollarization, to a Johannesburg or Kazan summit communique.”

By Camilo Flora Matsumbo, Researcher and economic analyst, Mozambique

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/global-south-financial-alternative-papss-brics

#Geopolitics #Africa #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Africa</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Why Gold Can Buy Political Distance and Garments Cannot</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-gold-can-buy-political-distance-and-garments-cannot</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-gold-can-buy-political-distance-and-garments-cannot</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Camilo Flora Matsumbo</dc:creator>
    <description>South Africa and Lesotho share a currency and a customs union, and absorbed the same American trade shock. The difference between their outcomes is not primarily about politics. It is about what each country sells, and how much of the value of those exports survives when the buyer changes.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/why-gold-can-buy-political-distance-and-garments-cannot.jpg" length="342759" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/why-gold-can-buy-political-distance-and-garments-cannot.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

WHY GOLD CAN BUY POLITICAL DISTANCE AND GARMENTS CANNOT

South Africa rode out US tariffs; Lesotho's garment trade collapsed. The difference is what travels with an export.

South Africa and Lesotho share a currency and a customs union, and absorbed the same American trade shock. The difference between their outcomes is not primarily about politics. It is about what each country sells, and how much of the value of those exports survives when the buyer changes.

From the opening:
“In August 2025, the United States imposed a 30% reciprocal tariff on South African goods and, through a combination of new duties and shifting exemptions, significantly eroded the commercial value of the country's preferential access under the African Growth and Opportunity Act.”

By Camilo Flora Matsumbo, Researcher and economic analyst, Mozambique

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-gold-can-buy-political-distance-and-garments-cannot

#Geopolitics #Africa #UnitedStates #Lesotho #SouthAfrica #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Africa</category>
    <category>Americas</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Nigeria&#x27;s Rating Upgrade Is Partly a War Dividend</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/nigeria-rating-upgrade-war-dividend</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/nigeria-rating-upgrade-war-dividend</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Camilo Flora Matsumbo</dc:creator>
    <description>Nigeria&#x27;s sovereign credit rating upgrade is being presented as proof that three years of painful reform have finally paid off. Some of it has. But part of the improvement traces back to an oil price spike tied to a war Nigeria did not start.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/nigeria-rating-upgrade-war-dividend.jpg" length="204689" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/nigeria-rating-upgrade-war-dividend.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

NIGERIA'S RATING UPGRADE IS PARTLY A WAR DIVIDEND

Three agencies upgraded Nigeria in thirteen months. How much reflects reform, and how much reflects a war-driven oil price?

Nigeria's sovereign credit rating upgrade is being presented as proof that three years of painful reform have finally paid off. Some of it has. But part of the improvement traces back to an oil price spike tied to a war Nigeria did not start.

From the opening:
“Nigeria's sovereign credit rating upgrade is being presented as proof that three years of painful reform have finally paid off. Some of it has.”

By Camilo Flora Matsumbo, Researcher and economic analyst, Mozambique

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/nigeria-rating-upgrade-war-dividend

#Geopolitics #Africa #Nigeria #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Africa</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Mozambique&#x27;s LNG Restart Is a Fiscal Bet on Timing</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/mozambique-lng-restart-fiscal-bet</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/mozambique-lng-restart-fiscal-bet</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Camilo Flora Matsumbo</dc:creator>
    <description>Mozambique&#x27;s delayed LNG restart could bring major gas revenues into state coffers just as a global supply wave reshapes prices, buyer leverage and the value of that revenue.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/mozambique-lng-restart-fiscal-bet.jpg" length="194201" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/mozambique-lng-restart-fiscal-bet.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

MOZAMBIQUE'S LNG RESTART IS A FISCAL BET ON TIMING

Mozambique's tax architecture defers most LNG revenue past 2030, just as a record supply wave reshapes global gas prices.

Mozambique's delayed LNG restart could bring major gas revenues into state coffers just as a global supply wave reshapes prices, buyer leverage and the value of that revenue.

From the opening:
“Mozambique's LNG restart is being described as the moment the country's long-delayed gas wealth finally comes within reach. But the fiscal question is more complicated. The state's own tax architecture, already visible in the project that is producing today, delays much of the expected revenue into the 2030s.”

By Camilo Flora Matsumbo, Researcher and economic analyst, Mozambique

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/mozambique-lng-restart-fiscal-bet

#Geopolitics #Africa #Mozambique #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Africa</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Mozambique&#x27;s Mining Law Is a Fiscal Bet on Resource Sovereignty</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/mozambique-mining-law-fiscal-bet</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/mozambique-mining-law-fiscal-bet</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Camilo Flora Matsumbo</dc:creator>
    <description>Mozambique&#x27;s 15% state mining stake could increase public control over mineral resources, but its success will depend on whether the country can attract the investment needed to turn that stake into actual revenue.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/mozambique-mining-law-fiscal-bet.jpg" length="219584" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/mozambique-mining-law-fiscal-bet.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

MOZAMBIQUE'S MINING LAW IS A FISCAL BET ON RESOURCE SOVEREIGNTY

A 15% state stake in every mine, demanded by a state whose external debt is 350% of national income.

Mozambique's 15% state mining stake could increase public control over mineral resources, but its success will depend on whether the country can attract the investment needed to turn that stake into actual revenue.

From the opening:
“Mozambique's new mining law is being presented as an assertion of greater control over the country's mineral resources. But control on paper is not the same as bargaining power in practice.”

By Camilo Flora Matsumbo, Researcher and economic analyst, Mozambique

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/mozambique-mining-law-fiscal-bet

#Geopolitics #Africa #Mozambique #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Africa</category>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>
