<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
  <title>The Geopolitical Economist · Dr Mukammil Shah Yousafzai</title>
  <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/authors/mukammil-shah-yousafzai</link>
  <atom:link href="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/authors/mukammil-shah-yousafzai.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
  <description>Dr Mukammil Shah Yousafzai is a researcher and analyst of geopolitics and geoeconomics, writing on South and Central Asia, China, India, Afghanistan, Pakistan and the Gulf. He is Director of Quality Assurance and Human Resource Development at Prime Group in Islamabad.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  
  <item>
    <title>The Iran War: Another Costly War on America’s Head</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/iran-war-cost-america-who-pays-who-profits</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/iran-war-cost-america-who-pays-who-profits</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dr Mukammil Shah Yousafzai</dc:creator>
    <description>Who Pays the Price, Who Profits, and Who Controls the Economic Fallout?</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/iran-war-cost-america-who-pays-who-profits.jpg" length="219443" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/iran-war-cost-america-who-pays-who-profits.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New opinion on The Geopolitical Economist

THE IRAN WAR: ANOTHER COSTLY WAR ON AMERICA’S HEAD

Dr Mukammil Shah Yousafzai examines America’s Iran war costs, energy disruption, potential beneficiaries and the consequences for households and poorer economies.

Who Pays the Price, Who Profits, and Who Controls the Economic Fallout?

From the opening:
“Wars are often launched in the language of national security but eventually become crises of economic sustainability, political legitimacy, and human survival. The ongoing US-Israeli war against Iran is another example of how military superiority can coexist with economic vulnerability.”

By Dr Mukammil Shah Yousafzai, Director of Quality Assurance and HRD, Prime Group, Islamabad

Read the full opinion: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/iran-war-cost-america-who-pays-who-profits

#Geopolitics #MiddleEast #UnitedStates #Iran #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Middle East &amp; North Africa</category>
    <category>Americas</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The Twenty-Year War That America Lost in Victory</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/afghanistan-twenty-year-war-america-lost</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/afghanistan-twenty-year-war-america-lost</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dr Mukammil Shah Yousafzai</dc:creator>
    <description>Afghanistan: The Human, Economic, and Strategic Cost to America, Its Allies, Pakistan, and the Region</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/afghanistan-twenty-year-war-america-lost.jpg" length="204016" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/afghanistan-twenty-year-war-america-lost.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

THE TWENTY-YEAR WAR THAT AMERICA LOST IN VICTORY

Dr Mukammil Shah Yousafzai examines the Afghanistan war’s human, economic and strategic costs for America, its allies, Pakistan and the wider region.

Afghanistan: The Human, Economic, and Strategic Cost to America, Its Allies, Pakistan, and the Region

From the opening:
“Twenty years of war. Two decades of consequences. One difficult question: Did the United States win the war it started—or did it achieve military objectives at a cost that undermined its strategic goals?”

By Dr Mukammil Shah Yousafzai, Director of Quality Assurance and HRD, Prime Group, Islamabad

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/afghanistan-twenty-year-war-america-lost

#Geopolitics #SouthAsia #UnitedStates #Pakistan #Afghanistan #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>South Asia</category>
    <category>Americas</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Pakistan&#x27;s Mineral Wealth: A Geological Fortune, A Governance Failure and A Geopolitical Contest</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/pakistan-mineral-wealth-reko-diq-governance</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/pakistan-mineral-wealth-reko-diq-governance</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dr Mukammil Shah Yousafzai</dc:creator>
    <description>Why a Resource-Rich Nation Has Yet to Transform Its Underground Wealth into Broad-Based Prosperity</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/pakistan-mineral-wealth-reko-diq-governance.jpg" length="166451" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/pakistan-mineral-wealth-reko-diq-governance.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

Pakistan's Mineral Wealth: A Geological Fortune, A Governance Failure and A Geopolitical Contest

Pakistan has copper, gold, coal and gems but little prosperity from them. Why, and who is competing for Reko Diq.

Why a Resource-Rich Nation Has Yet to Transform Its Underground Wealth into Broad-Based Prosperity

From the opening:
“Pakistan sits atop a geological fortune. Beneath its mountains, deserts and sedimentary basins lie copper, gold, coal, chromite, iron ore, rock salt, gypsum, limestone, marble, lead, zinc and precious gemstones.”

By Dr Mukammil Shah Yousafzai, Director of Quality Assurance and HRD, Prime Group, Islamabad

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/pakistan-mineral-wealth-reko-diq-governance

#Geopolitics #SouthAsia #China #Pakistan #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>South Asia</category>
    <category>Indo-Pacific</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Afghanistan After NATO: When the Balloon Economy Lost Its Air</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/afghanistan-after-nato-balloon-economy</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/afghanistan-after-nato-balloon-economy</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dr Mukammil Shah Yousafzai</dc:creator>
    <description>From the pre-9/11 battlefield to two decades of foreign-funded state-building — and now a search for economic survival</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/afghanistan-after-nato-balloon-economy.jpg" length="117738" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/afghanistan-after-nato-balloon-economy.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

AFGHANISTAN AFTER NATO: WHEN THE BALLOON ECONOMY LOST ITS AIR

Two decades of foreign money built a state in Afghanistan. When NATO left, it collapsed. Dr Mukammil Shah Yousafzai on what comes next.

From the pre-9/11 battlefield to two decades of foreign-funded state-building — and now a search for economic survival

From the opening:
“Afghanistan has always been more than a country on a map. It has been a meeting point of empires, civilizations, trade routes and competing geopolitical ambitions. Yet few periods transformed it as profoundly as the quarter-century following September 11, 2001.”

By Dr Mukammil Shah Yousafzai, Director of Quality Assurance and HRD, Prime Group, Islamabad

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/afghanistan-after-nato-balloon-economy

#Geopolitics #SouthAsia #Afghanistan #NATO #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>South Asia</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The Cost of Partition: What the Subcontinent Lost in 1947</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/cost-of-partition-1947-south-asia-economy</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/cost-of-partition-1947-south-asia-economy</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dr Mukammil Shah Yousafzai</dc:creator>
    <description>What was the economic, political and social price of dividing an integrated subcontinent?</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/cost-of-partition-1947-south-asia-economy.jpg" length="345303" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/cost-of-partition-1947-south-asia-economy.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

THE COST OF PARTITION: WHAT THE SUBCONTINENT LOST IN 1947

Partition split India and Pakistan’s shared economy: jute from its mills, cotton from its looms, canals from their markets.

What was the economic, political and social price of dividing an integrated subcontinent?

From the opening:
“There are dates in history that create new countries, and there are dates that permanently alter the economic geography of a civilisation. 1947 was both. The Partition of British India created two new dominions, India and Pakistan, but it also cut through an economic system that had developed over centuries.”

By Dr Mukammil Shah Yousafzai, Director of Quality Assurance and HRD, Prime Group, Islamabad

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/cost-of-partition-1947-south-asia-economy

#Geopolitics #SouthAsia #India #Pakistan #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>South Asia</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>What If We Were Not Enemies?</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/pakistan-india-what-if-we-were-not-enemies</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/pakistan-india-what-if-we-were-not-enemies</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dr Mukammil Shah Yousafzai</dc:creator>
    <description>Pakistan and India: two neighbours spending too much energy on each other, while poverty waits at the door</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/pakistan-india-what-if-we-were-not-enemies.jpg" length="295843" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/pakistan-india-what-if-we-were-not-enemies.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New opinion on The Geopolitical Economist

WHAT IF WE WERE NOT ENEMIES?

A view from Peshawar: what Pakistan and India lose to hostility, and what trade and investment in people could gain.

Pakistan and India: two neighbours spending too much energy on each other, while poverty waits at the door

From the opening:
“Imagine a different South Asia. A Pakistani from Karachi, Lahore, Quetta, Islamabad or Peshawar sitting across a table from an Indian from Delhi, Mumbai or Kolkata not as an enemy, not as a proxy, not as a soldier, but as a businessman, researcher, teacher, doctor, engineer, student or neighbour.”

By Dr Mukammil Shah Yousafzai, Director of Quality Assurance and HRD, Prime Group, Islamabad

Read the full opinion: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/pakistan-india-what-if-we-were-not-enemies

#Geopolitics #SouthAsia #India #Pakistan #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>South Asia</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Pakistan, Afghanistan Trade: From a Historic Lifeline to an Economic Deadlock</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/pakistan-afghanistan-trade-deadlock</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/pakistan-afghanistan-trade-deadlock</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dr Mukammil Shah Yousafzai</dc:creator>
    <description>When two neighbours close their doors, both sides pay the price.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/pakistan-afghanistan-trade-deadlock.jpg" length="236017" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/pakistan-afghanistan-trade-deadlock.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New briefing on The Geopolitical Economist

Pakistan, Afghanistan Trade: From a Historic Lifeline to an Economic Deadlock

Closed crossings cost Pakistan $177m a month and cut Afghan grape exports from 44,000 tonnes to 256.

When two neighbours close their doors, both sides pay the price.

From the opening:
“For decades, Pakistan and Afghanistan were connected not merely by a border but by a powerful economic artery. Karachi's ports provided Afghanistan with access to international markets, while Pakistani traders depended on Afghanistan for markets, transit business, fruits, vegetables, coal and other commodities.”

By Dr Mukammil Shah Yousafzai, Director of Quality Assurance and HRD, Prime Group, Islamabad

Read the full briefing: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/pakistan-afghanistan-trade-deadlock

#Geopolitics #SouthAsia #Pakistan #Afghanistan #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>South Asia</category>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>
