<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
  <title>The Geopolitical Economist · DR Congo</title>
  <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/countries/drc</link>
  <atom:link href="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/countries/drc.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
  <description>Articles on DR Congo.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  
  <item>
    <title>The Congo&#x27;s Cobalt Export Ban Looks Like a Sovereignty Move. Its Own Design Says Otherwise.</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/congo-cobalt-export-ban-quota-sovereignty</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/congo-cobalt-export-ban-quota-sovereignty</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Camilo Flora Matsumbo</dc:creator>
    <description>This analysis examines whether the DRC’s cobalt export restrictions represent genuine resource sovereignty or primarily expanded regulatory control. It argues that the 2025 quota system largely preserved the dominance of foreign-owned producers because its base allocation relied on historical export shares. While the state gained greater discretion over export rights in 2026, the clearest fiscal benefit still comes through existing mining royalties, rather than a substantial redistribution of cobalt rents.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/congo-cobalt-export-ban-quota-sovereignty.jpg" length="223864" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/congo-cobalt-export-ban-quota-sovereignty.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

The Congo's Cobalt Export Ban Looks Like a Sovereignty Move. Its Own Design Says Otherwise.

Congo's cobalt quotas follow 2022–24 exports, locking in CMOC and Glencore. The state's surest gain is a 10% royalty.

This analysis examines whether the DRC’s cobalt export restrictions represent genuine resource sovereignty or primarily expanded regulatory control. It argues that the 2025 quota system largely preserved the dominance of foreign-owned producers because its base allocation relied on historical export shares. While the state gained greater discretion over export rights in 2026, the clearest fiscal benefit still comes through existing mining royalties, rather than a substantial redistribution of cobalt rents.

From the opening:
“The Democratic Republic of the Congo produced an estimated 75 percent of the world's mined cobalt in 2024, according to the United States Geological Survey's National Minerals Information Center, a concentration of supply that gives the country a market position few commodity producers anywhere possess.”

By Camilo Flora Matsumbo, Researcher and economic analyst, Mozambique

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/congo-cobalt-export-ban-quota-sovereignty

#Geopolitics #Africa #China #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Africa</category>
    <category>Indo-Pacific</category>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>
