<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
  <title>The Geopolitical Economist · United States</title>
  <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/countries/united-states</link>
  <atom:link href="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/countries/united-states.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
  <description>Articles on United States.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  
  <item>
    <title>Why Gold Can Buy Political Distance and Garments Cannot</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-gold-can-buy-political-distance-and-garments-cannot</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-gold-can-buy-political-distance-and-garments-cannot</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Camilo Flora Matsumbo</dc:creator>
    <description>South Africa and Lesotho share a currency and a customs union, and absorbed the same American trade shock. The difference between their outcomes is not primarily about politics. It is about what each country sells, and how much of the value of those exports survives when the buyer changes.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/why-gold-can-buy-political-distance-and-garments-cannot.jpg" length="342759" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/why-gold-can-buy-political-distance-and-garments-cannot.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

WHY GOLD CAN BUY POLITICAL DISTANCE AND GARMENTS CANNOT

South Africa rode out US tariffs; Lesotho's garment trade collapsed. The difference is what travels with an export.

South Africa and Lesotho share a currency and a customs union, and absorbed the same American trade shock. The difference between their outcomes is not primarily about politics. It is about what each country sells, and how much of the value of those exports survives when the buyer changes.

From the opening:
“In August 2025, the United States imposed a 30% reciprocal tariff on South African goods and, through a combination of new duties and shifting exemptions, significantly eroded the commercial value of the country's preferential access under the African Growth and Opportunity Act.”

By Camilo Flora Matsumbo, Researcher and economic analyst, Mozambique

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-gold-can-buy-political-distance-and-garments-cannot

#Geopolitics #Africa #UnitedStates #Lesotho #SouthAfrica #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Africa</category>
    <category>Americas</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Trump Storms the UN Stage</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/trump-storms-the-un-stage</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/trump-storms-the-un-stage</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Daniel B. Gallagher</dc:creator>
    <description>Trump&#x27;s speech to the United Nations put the contours of &#x27;civilizationism&#x27; into greater relief. The real test case is not Iran but Cuba — and the ideology shaping both Trump&#x27;s and Rubio&#x27;s approach to the western hemisphere.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/trump-storms-the-un-stage.jpg" length="297289" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/trump-storms-the-un-stage.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New commentary on The Geopolitical Economist

TRUMP STORMS THE UN STAGE

Trump's UNGA speech on Cuba reveals civilizationism in action: great powers governing their own civilizational spheres. Cuba is the test case. By Daniel B. Gallagher.

Trump's speech to the United Nations put the contours of 'civilizationism' into greater relief. The real test case is not Iran but Cuba — and the ideology shaping both Trump's and Rubio's approach to the western hemisphere.

From the opening:
“For those who care about the latest political ideology, President Donald Trump's speech to the United Nations General Assembly on Tuesday put the contours of "civilizationism" into greater relief.”

By Daniel B. Gallagher, Lecturer in Literature and Philosophy, Ralston College, Savannah, GA

Read the full commentary: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/trump-storms-the-un-stage

#Geopolitics #UnitedStates #Iran #Cuba #UnitedNations #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Americas</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Why China Will Get What It Wants From Trump</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-china-will-get-what-it-wants-from-trump</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-china-will-get-what-it-wants-from-trump</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>Xi arrives in Washington with rare earths, cheap energy, and leverage. Trump arrives with $6 diesel and a war he can&#x27;t afford.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/why-china-will-get-what-it-wants-from-trump.jpg" length="216555" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/why-china-will-get-what-it-wants-from-trump.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

WHY CHINA WILL GET WHAT IT WANTS FROM TRUMP

Xi arrives with rare earths, cheap energy, and leverage. Trump arrives with $6 diesel and a war. Who needs this deal more?

From the opening:
“Xi Jinping lands at Joint Base Andrews tomorrow for a three-day summit that the White House is framing as a meeting of equals. It is not.”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-china-will-get-what-it-wants-from-trump

#Geopolitics #UnitedStates #China #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Americas</category>
    <category>Indo-Pacific</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Who Defines Tunisia&#x27;s Geopolitical Value? How Its Environment Shapes the State Itself</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/who-defines-tunisias-geopolitical-value</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/who-defines-tunisias-geopolitical-value</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Saif Eddine Ghobr</dc:creator>
    <description>Tunisia&#x27;s geopolitical value is not simply imposed by Europe, America or China. It is produced through an unequal exchange in which external demands reshape domestic incentives, and eventually the state itself.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/who-defines-tunisias-geopolitical-value.jpg" length="224586" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/who-defines-tunisias-geopolitical-value.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

Who Defines Tunisia's Geopolitical Value? How Its Environment Shapes the State Itself

Tunisia's strategic position earns it money and attention. A study of who captures that value, and what it does to the state.

Tunisia's geopolitical value is not simply imposed by Europe, America or China. It is produced through an unequal exchange in which external demands reshape domestic incentives, and eventually the state itself.

From the opening:
“Tunisia occupies a strategic position at the intersection of the Mediterranean, North Africa and the wider Arab world. It borders Algeria and Libya and sits close to Europe. Geography therefore gives Tunisia geopolitical value. But geography alone does not determine who captures that value.”

By Saif Eddine Ghobr, Founder, Tunisia Watch, Tunis

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/who-defines-tunisias-geopolitical-value

#Geopolitics #Africa #Europe #UnitedStates #China #Tunisia]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Africa</category>
    <category>Europe</category>
    <category>Americas</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Bangladesh&#x27;s BRICS Absence Was About More Than Protocol</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/bangladesh-brics-absence-was-about-more-than-protocol</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/bangladesh-brics-absence-was-about-more-than-protocol</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Kawsar Mia and Dr. Abdul Momen</dc:creator>
    <description>Dhaka&#x27;s no-show in New Delhi exposed a narrowing strategic space between BRICS-style financial autonomy and new U.S.-linked economic-security commitments.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/bangladesh-brics-absence-was-about-more-than-protocol.jpg" length="255400" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/bangladesh-brics-absence-was-about-more-than-protocol.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

BANGLADESH'S BRICS ABSENCE WAS ABOUT MORE THAN PROTOCOL

Dhaka's no-show in New Delhi was read as a protocol dispute. The trade agreement it signed in February explains more.

From the opening:
“Bangladesh's decision to stay away from the 18th BRICS Summit in New Delhi should not be read as proof that Dhaka has chosen Washington over BRICS.”

By Kawsar Mia and Dr. Abdul Momen

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/bangladesh-brics-absence-was-about-more-than-protocol

#Geopolitics #SouthAsia #UnitedStates #China #Bangladesh #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>South Asia</category>
    <category>Americas</category>
    <category>Indo-Pacific</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Canada Cannot Join Europe. It Can Get Most of the Way There.</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/canada-eu-associate-membership-risk-brief</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/canada-eu-associate-membership-risk-brief</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>J. Dyson</dc:creator>
    <description>Ottawa is exploring a status that does not exist, with a bloc whose treaties say it cannot join, to escape a neighbour that takes seven in ten of its exports. This brief sets out what is actually on the table, what is not, and how to price the outcomes.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/canada-eu-associate-membership-risk-brief.jpg" length="220112" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/canada-eu-associate-membership-risk-brief.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

CANADA CANNOT JOIN EUROPE. IT CAN GET MOST OF THE WAY THERE.

What an EU 'associate' status for Canada could contain, what the treaties rule out, and three scenarios with odds. By J. Dyson.

Ottawa is exploring a status that does not exist, with a bloc whose treaties say it cannot join, to escape a neighbour that takes seven in ten of its exports. This brief sets out what is actually on the table, what is not, and how to price the outcomes.

From the opening:
“On 13 September the Wall Street Journal reported that Prime Minister Mark Carney is exploring whether Canada could become an "associate member" of the European Union, and that officials on both sides were open to creating a status that does not currently exist. The European Commission declined to comment.”

By J. Dyson, Research and risk analyst

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/canada-eu-associate-membership-risk-brief

#Geopolitics #Europe #UnitedStates #Canada #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Europe</category>
    <category>Americas</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Washington Is Now Defending Russia&#x27;s Oil Refineries</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/trump-asks-ukraine-to-spare-russias-refineries</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/trump-asks-ukraine-to-spare-russias-refineries</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>American diesel passed $6 a gallon on Friday. On Sunday the President asked Ukraine to stop destroying the refineries of the country he is sanctioning. The two facts are the same fact.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/trump-asks-ukraine-to-spare-russias-refineries.jpg" length="263137" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/trump-asks-ukraine-to-spare-russias-refineries.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

WASHINGTON IS NOW DEFENDING RUSSIA'S OIL REFINERIES

Diesel at $6.05 has turned Russia's war economy into something America needs intact. What that costs Ukraine, and sanctions.

American diesel passed $6 a gallon on Friday. On Sunday the President asked Ukraine to stop destroying the refineries of the country he is sanctioning. The two facts are the same fact.

From the opening:
“On Friday the average price of a gallon of diesel in the United States reached $6.05, the highest ever recorded. A year ago it was $3.71. In California it is now $7.98. On Sunday, President Trump was asked about it. His answer was not about Iran, whose tankers the United States Navy has spent the month destroying.”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/trump-asks-ukraine-to-spare-russias-refineries

#Geopolitics #Russia #UnitedStates #Europe #Ukraine #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Russia &amp; Eurasia</category>
    <category>Americas</category>
    <category>Europe</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The Last Way Around Hormuz Is Closed</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/the-last-way-around-hormuz-is-closed</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/the-last-way-around-hormuz-is-closed</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>Drones launched from Iraq shut the pipeline that carried five million barrels a day past the strait. Brent is above $107, the ten-year Treasury is at 4.97%, and the Federal Reserve meets on Wednesday.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/the-last-way-around-hormuz-is-closed.jpg" length="216232" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/the-last-way-around-hormuz-is-closed.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

THE LAST WAY AROUND HORMUZ IS CLOSED

Drones from Iraq shut the pipeline carrying 5m barrels a day past Hormuz. What is left, and why it lands on US Treasury yields.

From the opening:
“For six months, every analysis of the Iran war has rested on an unstated assumption. The Strait of Hormuz could close, and the world would still get its oil, because Saudi Arabia had a way around it.”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/the-last-way-around-hormuz-is-closed

#Geopolitics #MiddleEast #UnitedStates #Hormuz #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Middle East &amp; North Africa</category>
    <category>Americas</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Why India and China Secretly Want the Dollar to Survive</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-india-and-china-secretly-want-the-dollar-to-survive</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-india-and-china-secretly-want-the-dollar-to-survive</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>The bloc&#x27;s two biggest economies hold trillions in dollar assets, and their rivalry makes a shared alternative even less likely.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/why-india-and-china-secretly-want-the-dollar-to-survive.jpg" length="161473" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/why-india-and-china-secretly-want-the-dollar-to-survive.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

WHY INDIA AND CHINA SECRETLY WANT THE DOLLAR TO SURVIVE

The bloc's two biggest economies hold trillions in dollar assets, and their rivalry makes a shared alternative even less likely.

From the opening:
“Vladimir Putin landed in New Delhi this morning. Xi Jinping arrives tomorrow, his first visit to India since 2019. Iran's Masoud Pezeshkian flies in from a country at war.”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-india-and-china-secretly-want-the-dollar-to-survive

#Geopolitics #China #SouthAsia #UnitedStates #India #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Indo-Pacific</category>
    <category>South Asia</category>
    <category>Americas</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Why Trump Can&#x27;t End the Iran War After the Midterms</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-trump-cant-end-the-iran-war-after-the-midterms</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-trump-cant-end-the-iran-war-after-the-midterms</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>The Vice President says by January 2029. The theory of how wars end says neither of them controls the date.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/why-trump-cant-end-the-iran-war-after-the-midterms.jpg" length="336106" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/why-trump-cant-end-the-iran-war-after-the-midterms.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

WHY TRUMP CAN'T END THE IRAN WAR AFTER THE MIDTERMS

The Vice President says by January 2029. The theory of how wars end says neither of them controls the date.

From the opening:
“Something strange happened at the White House this week. Trump announced an end date for a war his own government started, on the same day his advisers told him it might not end at all.”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-trump-cant-end-the-iran-war-after-the-midterms

#Geopolitics #MiddleEast #UnitedStates #Iran #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Middle East &amp; North Africa</category>
    <category>Americas</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>America Is Bombing Its Own Bond Market</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/america-is-bombing-its-own-bond-market</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/america-is-bombing-its-own-bond-market</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>Five Iranian tankers are burning, oil has crossed $100, and the U.S. Treasury is paying more than $1 trillion a year in interest. These three facts are one story.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/america-is-bombing-its-own-bond-market.jpg" length="156749" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/america-is-bombing-its-own-bond-market.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

AMERICA IS BOMBING ITS OWN BOND MARKET

Five Iranian tankers are burning, oil has crossed $100, and the U.S. Treasury is paying more than $1 trillion a year in interest. These three facts are one story.

From the opening:
“On Tuesday night the United States destroyed five Iranian oil tankers, the Kaviz, Charminar, Horizon 1, Riesco and Derya, in the Gulf of Oman and off Kharg Island. Iran answered within hours.”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/america-is-bombing-its-own-bond-market

#Geopolitics #MiddleEast #UnitedStates #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Middle East &amp; North Africa</category>
    <category>Americas</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Trump Doesn’t Want Money From His Allies. He Wants Their Soldiers.</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/trump-wants-their-soldiers</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/trump-wants-their-soldiers</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>South Korea pay the price of the US security guaranty</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/trump-wants-their-soldiers.jpg" length="169774" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/trump-wants-their-soldiers.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

TRUMP DOESN’T WANT MONEY FROM HIS ALLIES. HE WANTS THEIR SOLDIERS.

South Korea pay the price of the US security guaranty

From the opening:
“As you know, since Trump started the war in Iran, he is arguing that it’s not merely an American conflict, but a global conflict for which the allies in Europe step forward and join the United States.”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/trump-wants-their-soldiers

#Geopolitics #UnitedStates #China #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Americas</category>
    <category>Indo-Pacific</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The U.S. Imported Iranian Oil While Bombing Iran</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/us-imported-iranian-oil</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/us-imported-iranian-oil</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>For one month, a quiet Treasury licence made Iranian crude legal in American ports</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/us-imported-iranian-oil.jpg" length="263748" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/us-imported-iranian-oil.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

THE U.S. IMPORTED IRANIAN OIL WHILE BOMBING IRAN

For one month, a quiet Treasury licence made Iranian crude legal in American ports

From the opening:
“The United States is bombing Iran, intercepting its missiles, and showcasing and trying to maintain pressure on others to stop supporting the Iranian government But at the same point in time between this”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/us-imported-iranian-oil

#Geopolitics #MiddleEast #UnitedStates #Iran #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Middle East &amp; North Africa</category>
    <category>Americas</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The Crash Will Begin in America and Hit the Entire World</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/the-crash-will-begin-in-america</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/the-crash-will-begin-in-america</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>Much Worse Than 1929, 2000, and 2008</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/the-crash-will-begin-in-america.jpg" length="328341" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/the-crash-will-begin-in-america.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

THE CRASH WILL BEGIN IN AMERICA AND HIT THE ENTIRE WORLD

Much Worse Than 1929, 2000, and 2008

From the opening:
“We are living in the most volatile period of the 21st century. Something big is unfolding in front of our eyes. Power is shifting, old institutions are weakening, and the systems that once guaranteed stability are no longer trusted the way they used to be.”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/the-crash-will-begin-in-america

#Geopolitics #UnitedStates #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Americas</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Why Greenland Is Not Worth It for Trump</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-greenland-is-not-worth-it</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-greenland-is-not-worth-it</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>Natural resources, power politics, and the high price of coercion</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/why-greenland-is-not-worth-it.jpg" length="209288" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/why-greenland-is-not-worth-it.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

WHY GREENLAND IS NOT WORTH IT FOR TRUMP

Natural resources, power politics, and the high price of coercion

From the opening:
“When Trump talks about Greenland, we all know that there is nothing to do with the russia or China, instead He just wants the resources of the greenland. Rare earth elements. Critical minerals. Oil and gas. Strategic location.”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-greenland-is-not-worth-it

#Geopolitics #UnitedStates #Europe #Greenland #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Americas</category>
    <category>Europe</category>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>
