<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
  <title>The Geopolitical Economist · Energy &amp; Natural Resources</title>
  <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/issues/energy-resources</link>
  <atom:link href="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/issues/energy-resources.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
  <description>Oil, gas, pipelines, minerals and the states that control them.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  
  <item>
    <title>The Price Cap Didn&#x27;t Stop Russian Oil. It Created a Toll Booth.</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/russian-oil-price-cap-shadow-fleet-toll-booth</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/russian-oil-price-cap-shadow-fleet-toll-booth</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Camilo Flora Matsumbo</dc:creator>
    <description>The price cap was meant to cut Russia&#x27;s revenue while keeping its oil on the market. Its enforcement built a parallel shipping system whose costs are shared unevenly by exporters, shipowners, insurers, traders and refiners.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/russian-oil-price-cap-shadow-fleet-toll-booth.jpg" length="209873" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/russian-oil-price-cap-shadow-fleet-toll-booth.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

THE PRICE CAP DIDN'T STOP RUSSIAN OIL. IT CREATED A TOLL BOOTH.

The G7 price cap kept Russian oil flowing but spawned a shadow fleet that taxes every barrel along the way. Who pays the toll?

The price cap was meant to cut Russia's revenue while keeping its oil on the market. Its enforcement built a parallel shipping system whose costs are shared unevenly by exporters, shipowners, insurers, traders and refiners.

From the opening:
“Nearly four years after the Group of Seven, the European Union and Australia imposed a price cap on Russian seaborne crude, that oil is still reaching global markets largely as before. This is not, by itself, evidence that the policy failed. The U.S.”

By Camilo Flora Matsumbo, Researcher and economic analyst, Mozambique

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/russian-oil-price-cap-shadow-fleet-toll-booth

#Geopolitics #Russia #Europe #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Russia &amp; Eurasia</category>
    <category>Europe</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>What If We Were Not Enemies?</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/pakistan-india-what-if-we-were-not-enemies</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/pakistan-india-what-if-we-were-not-enemies</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dr Mukammil Shah Yousafzai</dc:creator>
    <description>Pakistan and India: two neighbours spending too much energy on each other, while poverty waits at the door</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/pakistan-india-what-if-we-were-not-enemies.jpg" length="295843" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/pakistan-india-what-if-we-were-not-enemies.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New opinion on The Geopolitical Economist

WHAT IF WE WERE NOT ENEMIES?

A view from Peshawar: what Pakistan and India lose to hostility, and what trade and investment in people could gain.

Pakistan and India: two neighbours spending too much energy on each other, while poverty waits at the door

From the opening:
“Imagine a different South Asia. A Pakistani from Karachi, Lahore, Quetta, Islamabad or Peshawar sitting across a table from an Indian from Delhi, Mumbai or Kolkata not as an enemy, not as a proxy, not as a soldier, but as a businessman, researcher, teacher, doctor, engineer, student or neighbour.”

By Dr Mukammil Shah Yousafzai, Director of Quality Assurance and HRD, Prime Group, Islamabad

Read the full opinion: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/pakistan-india-what-if-we-were-not-enemies

#Geopolitics #SouthAsia #India #Pakistan #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>South Asia</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Nigeria&#x27;s Rating Upgrade Is Partly a War Dividend</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/nigeria-rating-upgrade-war-dividend</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/nigeria-rating-upgrade-war-dividend</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Camilo Flora Matsumbo</dc:creator>
    <description>Nigeria&#x27;s sovereign credit rating upgrade is being presented as proof that three years of painful reform have finally paid off. Some of it has. But part of the improvement traces back to an oil price spike tied to a war Nigeria did not start.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/nigeria-rating-upgrade-war-dividend.jpg" length="204689" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/nigeria-rating-upgrade-war-dividend.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

NIGERIA'S RATING UPGRADE IS PARTLY A WAR DIVIDEND

Three agencies upgraded Nigeria in thirteen months. How much reflects reform, and how much reflects a war-driven oil price?

Nigeria's sovereign credit rating upgrade is being presented as proof that three years of painful reform have finally paid off. Some of it has. But part of the improvement traces back to an oil price spike tied to a war Nigeria did not start.

From the opening:
“Nigeria's sovereign credit rating upgrade is being presented as proof that three years of painful reform have finally paid off. Some of it has.”

By Camilo Flora Matsumbo, Researcher and economic analyst, Mozambique

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/nigeria-rating-upgrade-war-dividend

#Geopolitics #Africa #Nigeria #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Africa</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Beyond Hormuz: How Saudi Arabia&#x27;s Oil-Route Redundancy Is Being Tested</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/beyond-hormuz-saudi-oil-route-redundancy</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/beyond-hormuz-saudi-oil-route-redundancy</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Seif A. Harrasy</dc:creator>
    <description>The East-West pipeline gives Saudi Arabia an alternative to the Strait of Hormuz, but when one route fails, the remaining routes can become new points of vulnerability.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/beyond-hormuz-saudi-oil-route-redundancy.jpg" length="223566" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/beyond-hormuz-saudi-oil-route-redundancy.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

Beyond Hormuz: How Saudi Arabia's Oil-Route Redundancy Is Being Tested

The East-West pipeline, Hormuz and Bab el-Mandeb are all disrupted at once. Saudi oil-route redundancy is being tested to its limit. By Seif A. Harrasy.

The East-West pipeline gives Saudi Arabia an alternative to the Strait of Hormuz, but when one route fails, the remaining routes can become new points of vulnerability.

From the opening:
“Saudi Arabia built the East-West Pipeline during the Iran-Iraq War to reduce its exposure to a single chokepoint, serving as an alternative route to the Strait of Hormuz.”

By Seif A. Harrasy, MENA risk researcher, SOAS University of London

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/beyond-hormuz-saudi-oil-route-redundancy

#Geopolitics #MiddleEast #SaudiArabia #Hormuz #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Middle East &amp; North Africa</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Why China Will Get What It Wants From Trump</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-china-will-get-what-it-wants-from-trump</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-china-will-get-what-it-wants-from-trump</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>Xi arrives in Washington with rare earths, cheap energy, and leverage. Trump arrives with $6 diesel and a war he can&#x27;t afford.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/why-china-will-get-what-it-wants-from-trump.jpg" length="216555" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/why-china-will-get-what-it-wants-from-trump.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

WHY CHINA WILL GET WHAT IT WANTS FROM TRUMP

Xi arrives with rare earths, cheap energy, and leverage. Trump arrives with $6 diesel and a war. Who needs this deal more?

From the opening:
“Xi Jinping lands at Joint Base Andrews tomorrow for a three-day summit that the White House is framing as a meeting of equals. It is not.”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-china-will-get-what-it-wants-from-trump

#Geopolitics #UnitedStates #China #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Americas</category>
    <category>Indo-Pacific</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Mozambique&#x27;s LNG Restart Is a Fiscal Bet on Timing</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/mozambique-lng-restart-fiscal-bet</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/mozambique-lng-restart-fiscal-bet</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Camilo Flora Matsumbo</dc:creator>
    <description>Mozambique&#x27;s delayed LNG restart could bring major gas revenues into state coffers just as a global supply wave reshapes prices, buyer leverage and the value of that revenue.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/mozambique-lng-restart-fiscal-bet.jpg" length="194201" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/mozambique-lng-restart-fiscal-bet.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

MOZAMBIQUE'S LNG RESTART IS A FISCAL BET ON TIMING

Mozambique's tax architecture defers most LNG revenue past 2030, just as a record supply wave reshapes global gas prices.

Mozambique's delayed LNG restart could bring major gas revenues into state coffers just as a global supply wave reshapes prices, buyer leverage and the value of that revenue.

From the opening:
“Mozambique's LNG restart is being described as the moment the country's long-delayed gas wealth finally comes within reach. But the fiscal question is more complicated. The state's own tax architecture, already visible in the project that is producing today, delays much of the expected revenue into the 2030s.”

By Camilo Flora Matsumbo, Researcher and economic analyst, Mozambique

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/mozambique-lng-restart-fiscal-bet

#Geopolitics #Africa #Mozambique #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Africa</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Mozambique&#x27;s Mining Law Is a Fiscal Bet on Resource Sovereignty</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/mozambique-mining-law-fiscal-bet</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/mozambique-mining-law-fiscal-bet</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Camilo Flora Matsumbo</dc:creator>
    <description>Mozambique&#x27;s 15% state mining stake could increase public control over mineral resources, but its success will depend on whether the country can attract the investment needed to turn that stake into actual revenue.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/mozambique-mining-law-fiscal-bet.jpg" length="219584" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/mozambique-mining-law-fiscal-bet.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

MOZAMBIQUE'S MINING LAW IS A FISCAL BET ON RESOURCE SOVEREIGNTY

A 15% state stake in every mine, demanded by a state whose external debt is 350% of national income.

Mozambique's 15% state mining stake could increase public control over mineral resources, but its success will depend on whether the country can attract the investment needed to turn that stake into actual revenue.

From the opening:
“Mozambique's new mining law is being presented as an assertion of greater control over the country's mineral resources. But control on paper is not the same as bargaining power in practice.”

By Camilo Flora Matsumbo, Researcher and economic analyst, Mozambique

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/mozambique-mining-law-fiscal-bet

#Geopolitics #Africa #Mozambique #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Africa</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Canada Cannot Join Europe. It Can Get Most of the Way There.</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/canada-eu-associate-membership-risk-brief</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/canada-eu-associate-membership-risk-brief</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>J. Dyson</dc:creator>
    <description>Ottawa is exploring a status that does not exist, with a bloc whose treaties say it cannot join, to escape a neighbour that takes seven in ten of its exports. This brief sets out what is actually on the table, what is not, and how to price the outcomes.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/canada-eu-associate-membership-risk-brief.jpg" length="220112" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/canada-eu-associate-membership-risk-brief.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

CANADA CANNOT JOIN EUROPE. IT CAN GET MOST OF THE WAY THERE.

What an EU 'associate' status for Canada could contain, what the treaties rule out, and three scenarios with odds. By J. Dyson.

Ottawa is exploring a status that does not exist, with a bloc whose treaties say it cannot join, to escape a neighbour that takes seven in ten of its exports. This brief sets out what is actually on the table, what is not, and how to price the outcomes.

From the opening:
“On 13 September the Wall Street Journal reported that Prime Minister Mark Carney is exploring whether Canada could become an "associate member" of the European Union, and that officials on both sides were open to creating a status that does not currently exist. The European Commission declined to comment.”

By J. Dyson, Research and risk analyst

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/canada-eu-associate-membership-risk-brief

#Geopolitics #Europe #UnitedStates #Canada #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Europe</category>
    <category>Americas</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Washington Is Now Defending Russia&#x27;s Oil Refineries</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/trump-asks-ukraine-to-spare-russias-refineries</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/trump-asks-ukraine-to-spare-russias-refineries</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>American diesel passed $6 a gallon on Friday. On Sunday the President asked Ukraine to stop destroying the refineries of the country he is sanctioning. The two facts are the same fact.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/trump-asks-ukraine-to-spare-russias-refineries.jpg" length="263137" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/trump-asks-ukraine-to-spare-russias-refineries.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

WASHINGTON IS NOW DEFENDING RUSSIA'S OIL REFINERIES

Diesel at $6.05 has turned Russia's war economy into something America needs intact. What that costs Ukraine, and sanctions.

American diesel passed $6 a gallon on Friday. On Sunday the President asked Ukraine to stop destroying the refineries of the country he is sanctioning. The two facts are the same fact.

From the opening:
“On Friday the average price of a gallon of diesel in the United States reached $6.05, the highest ever recorded. A year ago it was $3.71. In California it is now $7.98. On Sunday, President Trump was asked about it. His answer was not about Iran, whose tankers the United States Navy has spent the month destroying.”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/trump-asks-ukraine-to-spare-russias-refineries

#Geopolitics #Russia #UnitedStates #Europe #Ukraine #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Russia &amp; Eurasia</category>
    <category>Americas</category>
    <category>Europe</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The Last Way Around Hormuz Is Closed</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/the-last-way-around-hormuz-is-closed</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/the-last-way-around-hormuz-is-closed</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>Drones launched from Iraq shut the pipeline that carried five million barrels a day past the strait. Brent is above $107, the ten-year Treasury is at 4.97%, and the Federal Reserve meets on Wednesday.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/the-last-way-around-hormuz-is-closed.jpg" length="216232" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/the-last-way-around-hormuz-is-closed.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

THE LAST WAY AROUND HORMUZ IS CLOSED

Drones from Iraq shut the pipeline carrying 5m barrels a day past Hormuz. What is left, and why it lands on US Treasury yields.

From the opening:
“For six months, every analysis of the Iran war has rested on an unstated assumption. The Strait of Hormuz could close, and the world would still get its oil, because Saudi Arabia had a way around it.”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/the-last-way-around-hormuz-is-closed

#Geopolitics #MiddleEast #UnitedStates #Hormuz #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Middle East &amp; North Africa</category>
    <category>Americas</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Why Trump Can&#x27;t End the Iran War After the Midterms</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-trump-cant-end-the-iran-war-after-the-midterms</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-trump-cant-end-the-iran-war-after-the-midterms</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>The Vice President says by January 2029. The theory of how wars end says neither of them controls the date.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/why-trump-cant-end-the-iran-war-after-the-midterms.jpg" length="336106" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/why-trump-cant-end-the-iran-war-after-the-midterms.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

WHY TRUMP CAN'T END THE IRAN WAR AFTER THE MIDTERMS

The Vice President says by January 2029. The theory of how wars end says neither of them controls the date.

From the opening:
“Something strange happened at the White House this week. Trump announced an end date for a war his own government started, on the same day his advisers told him it might not end at all.”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-trump-cant-end-the-iran-war-after-the-midterms

#Geopolitics #MiddleEast #UnitedStates #Iran #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Middle East &amp; North Africa</category>
    <category>Americas</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>America Is Bombing Its Own Bond Market</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/america-is-bombing-its-own-bond-market</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/america-is-bombing-its-own-bond-market</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>Five Iranian tankers are burning, oil has crossed $100, and the U.S. Treasury is paying more than $1 trillion a year in interest. These three facts are one story.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/america-is-bombing-its-own-bond-market.jpg" length="156749" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/america-is-bombing-its-own-bond-market.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

AMERICA IS BOMBING ITS OWN BOND MARKET

Five Iranian tankers are burning, oil has crossed $100, and the U.S. Treasury is paying more than $1 trillion a year in interest. These three facts are one story.

From the opening:
“On Tuesday night the United States destroyed five Iranian oil tankers, the Kaviz, Charminar, Horizon 1, Riesco and Derya, in the Gulf of Oman and off Kharg Island. Iran answered within hours.”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/america-is-bombing-its-own-bond-market

#Geopolitics #MiddleEast #UnitedStates #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Middle East &amp; North Africa</category>
    <category>Americas</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The U.S. Imported Iranian Oil While Bombing Iran</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/us-imported-iranian-oil</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/us-imported-iranian-oil</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>For one month, a quiet Treasury licence made Iranian crude legal in American ports</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/us-imported-iranian-oil.jpg" length="263748" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/us-imported-iranian-oil.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

THE U.S. IMPORTED IRANIAN OIL WHILE BOMBING IRAN

For one month, a quiet Treasury licence made Iranian crude legal in American ports

From the opening:
“The United States is bombing Iran, intercepting its missiles, and showcasing and trying to maintain pressure on others to stop supporting the Iranian government But at the same point in time between this”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/us-imported-iranian-oil

#Geopolitics #MiddleEast #UnitedStates #Iran #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Middle East &amp; North Africa</category>
    <category>Americas</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Iran Is Waiting for the US Midterm Elections</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/iran-waiting-for-midterms</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/iran-waiting-for-midterms</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>In 1980, It Waited for the American Election, and It Is Waiting Again.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/iran-waiting-for-midterms.jpg" length="166404" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/iran-waiting-for-midterms.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

IRAN IS WAITING FOR THE US MIDTERM ELECTIONS

In 1980, It Waited for the American Election, and It Is Waiting Again.

From the opening:
“On Monday, Trump said his administration had opened a back channel to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The IRGC denied it. On Tuesday, Trump posted this: The Strait is not, in any commercially meaningful sense, open and operating.”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/iran-waiting-for-midterms

#Geopolitics #MiddleEast #UnitedStates #Iran #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Middle East &amp; North Africa</category>
    <category>Americas</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Why Greenland Is Not Worth It for Trump</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-greenland-is-not-worth-it</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-greenland-is-not-worth-it</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>Natural resources, power politics, and the high price of coercion</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/why-greenland-is-not-worth-it.jpg" length="209288" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/why-greenland-is-not-worth-it.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

WHY GREENLAND IS NOT WORTH IT FOR TRUMP

Natural resources, power politics, and the high price of coercion

From the opening:
“When Trump talks about Greenland, we all know that there is nothing to do with the russia or China, instead He just wants the resources of the greenland. Rare earth elements. Critical minerals. Oil and gas. Strategic location.”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-greenland-is-not-worth-it

#Geopolitics #UnitedStates #Europe #Greenland #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Americas</category>
    <category>Europe</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Russia’s War Economy Is Finally Breaking Apart</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/russias-war-economy-breaking-apart</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/russias-war-economy-breaking-apart</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2025 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>The Illusion of Strength Is Fading</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/russias-war-economy-breaking-apart.jpg" length="272969" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/russias-war-economy-breaking-apart.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

RUSSIA’S WAR ECONOMY IS FINALLY BREAKING APART

The Illusion of Strength Is Fading

From the opening:
“For the last three years, Russia has avoiding its economic collapse despite the toughest Western sanctions since the war began, factories kept running, the ruble stayed stable, and its GDP even grew faster than some EU countries.”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/russias-war-economy-breaking-apart

#Geopolitics #Russia #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Russia &amp; Eurasia</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Russia’s Next Targets? After Ukraine</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/russias-next-targets-after-ukraine</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/russias-next-targets-after-ukraine</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2025 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>Putin’s Expansionist Ambitions</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/russias-next-targets-after-ukraine.jpg" length="294572" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/russias-next-targets-after-ukraine.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

RUSSIA’S NEXT TARGETS? AFTER UKRAINE

Putin’s Expansionist Ambitions

Putin’s Expansionist Ambitions

From the opening:
“Zelensky, since the invasion of Ukraine, is saying that Russia is not going to stop in Ukraine According to Zelensky, Putin could target five European nations next, including Poland and the Baltic states — Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania.”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/russias-next-targets-after-ukraine

#Geopolitics #Russia #Europe #Ukraine #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Russia &amp; Eurasia</category>
    <category>Europe</category>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>
