<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
  <title>The Geopolitical Economist · Maritime Affairs</title>
  <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/issues/maritime</link>
  <atom:link href="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/issues/maritime.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
  <description>Shipping, straits, ports, navies and the sea lanes trade depends on.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  
  <item>
    <title>The Price Cap Didn&#x27;t Stop Russian Oil. It Created a Toll Booth.</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/russian-oil-price-cap-shadow-fleet-toll-booth</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/russian-oil-price-cap-shadow-fleet-toll-booth</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Camilo Flora Matsumbo</dc:creator>
    <description>The price cap was meant to cut Russia&#x27;s revenue while keeping its oil on the market. Its enforcement built a parallel shipping system whose costs are shared unevenly by exporters, shipowners, insurers, traders and refiners.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/russian-oil-price-cap-shadow-fleet-toll-booth.jpg" length="209873" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/russian-oil-price-cap-shadow-fleet-toll-booth.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

THE PRICE CAP DIDN'T STOP RUSSIAN OIL. IT CREATED A TOLL BOOTH.

The G7 price cap kept Russian oil flowing but spawned a shadow fleet that taxes every barrel along the way. Who pays the toll?

The price cap was meant to cut Russia's revenue while keeping its oil on the market. Its enforcement built a parallel shipping system whose costs are shared unevenly by exporters, shipowners, insurers, traders and refiners.

From the opening:
“Nearly four years after the Group of Seven, the European Union and Australia imposed a price cap on Russian seaborne crude, that oil is still reaching global markets largely as before. This is not, by itself, evidence that the policy failed. The U.S.”

By Camilo Flora Matsumbo, Researcher and economic analyst, Mozambique

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/russian-oil-price-cap-shadow-fleet-toll-booth

#Geopolitics #Russia #Europe #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Russia &amp; Eurasia</category>
    <category>Europe</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The Sandals Gatekeepers: How a Houthi–Horn Axis Could Redraw Red Sea Power</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/sandals-gatekeepers-houthi-horn-axis-red-sea</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/sandals-gatekeepers-houthi-horn-axis-red-sea</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Frank Genin</dc:creator>
    <description>In September the Houthis stopped being an insurgency and became a landlord. With al Shabaab on the opposite shore, the Red Sea faces a dual chokepoint squeeze.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/sandals-gatekeepers-houthi-horn-axis-red-sea.jpg" length="224827" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/sandals-gatekeepers-houthi-horn-axis-red-sea.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

The Sandals Gatekeepers: How a Houthi–Horn Axis Could Redraw Red Sea Power

The Houthis hold the Bab el Mandeb islands and a partner on the Somali shore. Three scenarios for a Red Sea toll regime.

In September the Houthis stopped being an insurgency and became a landlord. With al Shabaab on the opposite shore, the Red Sea faces a dual chokepoint squeeze.

From the opening:
“In the first half of September 2026, Yemen's Iran-aligned Houthis stopped being an insurgency and became a landlord. A short, fast offensive handed them the entire western Red Sea coastline, the port of Mokha, and the islands that sit inside the Bab el Mandeb: Perim, Zuqar, the Greater and Lesser Hanish.”

By Frank Genin, Geopolitical analyst and board strategy adviser; editor, Geopolitics Sunday Brief

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/sandals-gatekeepers-houthi-horn-axis-red-sea

#Geopolitics #MiddleEast #Africa #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Middle East &amp; North Africa</category>
    <category>Africa</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The UAE Doesn&#x27;t Buy Africa&#x27;s Goods. It Buys the Gates.</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/uae-africa-ports-gold-gates</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/uae-africa-ports-gold-gates</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Camilo Flora Matsumbo</dc:creator>
    <description>Emirati influence in Africa is better measured by position than by pledges: ports, gold markets and farmland place the UAE at the points where African goods change jurisdiction or form.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/uae-africa-ports-gold-gates.jpg" length="281520" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/uae-africa-ports-gold-gates.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

THE UAE DOESN'T BUY AFRICA'S GOODS. IT BUYS THE GATES.

Emirati influence in Africa is measured by position, not pledges: the ports, gold hub and land where value is captured.

From the opening:
“The usual way to measure Gulf money in Africa is by the size of the pledge: so many billions announced, so many projects signed. That is the wrong unit. The more revealing measure is position.”

By Camilo Flora Matsumbo, Researcher and economic analyst, Mozambique

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/uae-africa-ports-gold-gates

#Geopolitics #Africa #MiddleEast #UAE #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Africa</category>
    <category>Middle East &amp; North Africa</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Egypt Didn&#x27;t Fix Its Foreign Currency Problem. It Rented a Solution.</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/egypt-ras-el-hekma-suez-foreign-currency</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/egypt-ras-el-hekma-suez-foreign-currency</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Camilo Flora Matsumbo</dc:creator>
    <description>The $35 billion Ras El-Hekma deal with the UAE, not structural reform alone, most immediately eased Egypt&#x27;s foreign-exchange crisis, arriving just as Houthi attacks collapsed Suez Canal revenue.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/egypt-ras-el-hekma-suez-foreign-currency.jpg" length="195508" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/egypt-ras-el-hekma-suez-foreign-currency.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

EGYPT DIDN'T FIX ITS FOREIGN CURRENCY PROBLEM. IT RENTED A SOLUTION.

A $35bn land deal eased Egypt's currency crisis just as Suez revenue collapsed. Has its capacity to earn dollars recovered?

The $35 billion Ras El-Hekma deal with the UAE, not structural reform alone, most immediately eased Egypt's foreign-exchange crisis, arriving just as Houthi attacks collapsed Suez Canal revenue.

From the opening:
“Egypt's economic improvement since 2024, reflected in faster growth, sharply lower inflation and rebuilt reserves, is often described as the payoff from a hard, IMF-backed reform program. Much of that improvement reflects genuine adjustment and reform.”

By Camilo Flora Matsumbo, Researcher and economic analyst, Mozambique

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/egypt-ras-el-hekma-suez-foreign-currency

#Geopolitics #Africa #MiddleEast #Egypt #UAE #Suez]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Africa</category>
    <category>Middle East &amp; North Africa</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Beyond Hormuz: How Saudi Arabia&#x27;s Oil-Route Redundancy Is Being Tested</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/beyond-hormuz-saudi-oil-route-redundancy</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/beyond-hormuz-saudi-oil-route-redundancy</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Seif A. Harrasy</dc:creator>
    <description>The East-West pipeline gives Saudi Arabia an alternative to the Strait of Hormuz, but when one route fails, the remaining routes can become new points of vulnerability.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/beyond-hormuz-saudi-oil-route-redundancy.jpg" length="223566" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/beyond-hormuz-saudi-oil-route-redundancy.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

Beyond Hormuz: How Saudi Arabia's Oil-Route Redundancy Is Being Tested

The East-West pipeline, Hormuz and Bab el-Mandeb are all disrupted at once. Saudi oil-route redundancy is being tested to its limit. By Seif A. Harrasy.

The East-West pipeline gives Saudi Arabia an alternative to the Strait of Hormuz, but when one route fails, the remaining routes can become new points of vulnerability.

From the opening:
“Saudi Arabia built the East-West Pipeline during the Iran-Iraq War to reduce its exposure to a single chokepoint, serving as an alternative route to the Strait of Hormuz.”

By Seif A. Harrasy, MENA risk researcher, SOAS University of London

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/beyond-hormuz-saudi-oil-route-redundancy

#Geopolitics #MiddleEast #SaudiArabia #Hormuz #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Middle East &amp; North Africa</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The Last Way Around Hormuz Is Closed</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/the-last-way-around-hormuz-is-closed</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/the-last-way-around-hormuz-is-closed</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>Drones launched from Iraq shut the pipeline that carried five million barrels a day past the strait. Brent is above $107, the ten-year Treasury is at 4.97%, and the Federal Reserve meets on Wednesday.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/the-last-way-around-hormuz-is-closed.jpg" length="216232" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/the-last-way-around-hormuz-is-closed.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

THE LAST WAY AROUND HORMUZ IS CLOSED

Drones from Iraq shut the pipeline carrying 5m barrels a day past Hormuz. What is left, and why it lands on US Treasury yields.

From the opening:
“For six months, every analysis of the Iran war has rested on an unstated assumption. The Strait of Hormuz could close, and the world would still get its oil, because Saudi Arabia had a way around it.”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/the-last-way-around-hormuz-is-closed

#Geopolitics #MiddleEast #UnitedStates #Hormuz #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Middle East &amp; North Africa</category>
    <category>Americas</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Why Trump Can&#x27;t End the Iran War After the Midterms</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-trump-cant-end-the-iran-war-after-the-midterms</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-trump-cant-end-the-iran-war-after-the-midterms</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>The Vice President says by January 2029. The theory of how wars end says neither of them controls the date.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/why-trump-cant-end-the-iran-war-after-the-midterms.jpg" length="336106" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/why-trump-cant-end-the-iran-war-after-the-midterms.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

WHY TRUMP CAN'T END THE IRAN WAR AFTER THE MIDTERMS

The Vice President says by January 2029. The theory of how wars end says neither of them controls the date.

From the opening:
“Something strange happened at the White House this week. Trump announced an end date for a war his own government started, on the same day his advisers told him it might not end at all.”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-trump-cant-end-the-iran-war-after-the-midterms

#Geopolitics #MiddleEast #UnitedStates #Iran #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Middle East &amp; North Africa</category>
    <category>Americas</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>America Is Bombing Its Own Bond Market</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/america-is-bombing-its-own-bond-market</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/america-is-bombing-its-own-bond-market</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>Five Iranian tankers are burning, oil has crossed $100, and the U.S. Treasury is paying more than $1 trillion a year in interest. These three facts are one story.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/america-is-bombing-its-own-bond-market.jpg" length="156749" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/america-is-bombing-its-own-bond-market.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

AMERICA IS BOMBING ITS OWN BOND MARKET

Five Iranian tankers are burning, oil has crossed $100, and the U.S. Treasury is paying more than $1 trillion a year in interest. These three facts are one story.

From the opening:
“On Tuesday night the United States destroyed five Iranian oil tankers, the Kaviz, Charminar, Horizon 1, Riesco and Derya, in the Gulf of Oman and off Kharg Island. Iran answered within hours.”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/america-is-bombing-its-own-bond-market

#Geopolitics #MiddleEast #UnitedStates #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Middle East &amp; North Africa</category>
    <category>Americas</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>China Won’t Invade Taiwan. It Will Quarantine It.</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/china-wont-invade-taiwan</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/china-wont-invade-taiwan</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>A blockade is an act of war. A quarantine is paperwork</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/china-wont-invade-taiwan.jpg" length="248323" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/china-wont-invade-taiwan.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

CHINA WON’T INVADE TAIWAN. IT WILL QUARANTINE IT.

A blockade is an act of war. A quarantine is paperwork

From the opening:
“China has played a very clever move. There is an announcement from Beijing that ships bound for the Taiwanese port of Kaohsiung must now file their cargo paperwork with Chinese authorities 48 hours in advance.”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/china-wont-invade-taiwan

#Geopolitics #China #Taiwan #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Indo-Pacific</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The U.S. Imported Iranian Oil While Bombing Iran</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/us-imported-iranian-oil</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/us-imported-iranian-oil</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>For one month, a quiet Treasury licence made Iranian crude legal in American ports</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/us-imported-iranian-oil.jpg" length="263748" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/us-imported-iranian-oil.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

THE U.S. IMPORTED IRANIAN OIL WHILE BOMBING IRAN

For one month, a quiet Treasury licence made Iranian crude legal in American ports

From the opening:
“The United States is bombing Iran, intercepting its missiles, and showcasing and trying to maintain pressure on others to stop supporting the Iranian government But at the same point in time between this”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/us-imported-iranian-oil

#Geopolitics #MiddleEast #UnitedStates #Iran #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Middle East &amp; North Africa</category>
    <category>Americas</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>India-Pakistan: The Next Major War?</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/india-pakistan-the-next-major-war</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/india-pakistan-the-next-major-war</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>5 ways India can respond to the terrorist attack by Pakistan</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/india-pakistan-the-next-major-war.jpg" length="260957" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/india-pakistan-the-next-major-war.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

INDIA-PAKISTAN: THE NEXT MAJOR WAR?

5 ways India can respond to the terrorist attack by Pakistan

From the opening:
“The thing that was started by the Pakistan-backed terrorist attack can be turned into a small-scale war between both nations The terrorists killed the unarmed Indian tourists — families, honeymooners, kids — who were attacked by terrorists in one of the most heartbreaking incidents we’ve seen in recent times.”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/india-pakistan-the-next-major-war

#Geopolitics #SouthAsia #India #Pakistan #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>South Asia</category>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>
