<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
  <title>The Geopolitical Economist · Political Economy &amp; Global Economics</title>
  <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/issues/political-economy</link>
  <atom:link href="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/issues/political-economy.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
  <description>Growth, inflation, debt, currencies and the politics that shape them.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  
  <item>
    <title>Afghanistan After NATO: When the Balloon Economy Lost Its Air</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/afghanistan-after-nato-balloon-economy</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/afghanistan-after-nato-balloon-economy</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dr Mukammil Shah Yousafzai</dc:creator>
    <description>From the pre-9/11 battlefield to two decades of foreign-funded state-building — and now a search for economic survival</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/afghanistan-after-nato-balloon-economy.jpg" length="117738" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/afghanistan-after-nato-balloon-economy.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

AFGHANISTAN AFTER NATO: WHEN THE BALLOON ECONOMY LOST ITS AIR

Two decades of foreign money built a state in Afghanistan. When NATO left, it collapsed. Dr Mukammil Shah Yousafzai on what comes next.

From the pre-9/11 battlefield to two decades of foreign-funded state-building — and now a search for economic survival

From the opening:
“Afghanistan has always been more than a country on a map. It has been a meeting point of empires, civilizations, trade routes and competing geopolitical ambitions. Yet few periods transformed it as profoundly as the quarter-century following September 11, 2001.”

By Dr Mukammil Shah Yousafzai, Director of Quality Assurance and HRD, Prime Group, Islamabad

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/afghanistan-after-nato-balloon-economy

#Geopolitics #SouthAsia #Afghanistan #NATO #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>South Asia</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The UAE Doesn&#x27;t Buy Africa&#x27;s Goods. It Buys the Gates.</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/uae-africa-ports-gold-gates</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/uae-africa-ports-gold-gates</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Camilo Flora Matsumbo</dc:creator>
    <description>Emirati influence in Africa is better measured by position than by pledges: ports, gold markets and farmland place the UAE at the points where African goods change jurisdiction or form.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/uae-africa-ports-gold-gates.jpg" length="281520" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/uae-africa-ports-gold-gates.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

THE UAE DOESN'T BUY AFRICA'S GOODS. IT BUYS THE GATES.

Emirati influence in Africa is measured by position, not pledges: the ports, gold hub and land where value is captured.

From the opening:
“The usual way to measure Gulf money in Africa is by the size of the pledge: so many billions announced, so many projects signed. That is the wrong unit. The more revealing measure is position.”

By Camilo Flora Matsumbo, Researcher and economic analyst, Mozambique

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/uae-africa-ports-gold-gates

#Geopolitics #Africa #MiddleEast #UAE #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Africa</category>
    <category>Middle East &amp; North Africa</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Egypt Didn&#x27;t Fix Its Foreign Currency Problem. It Rented a Solution.</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/egypt-ras-el-hekma-suez-foreign-currency</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/egypt-ras-el-hekma-suez-foreign-currency</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Camilo Flora Matsumbo</dc:creator>
    <description>The $35 billion Ras El-Hekma deal with the UAE, not structural reform alone, most immediately eased Egypt&#x27;s foreign-exchange crisis, arriving just as Houthi attacks collapsed Suez Canal revenue.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/egypt-ras-el-hekma-suez-foreign-currency.jpg" length="195508" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/egypt-ras-el-hekma-suez-foreign-currency.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

EGYPT DIDN'T FIX ITS FOREIGN CURRENCY PROBLEM. IT RENTED A SOLUTION.

A $35bn land deal eased Egypt's currency crisis just as Suez revenue collapsed. Has its capacity to earn dollars recovered?

The $35 billion Ras El-Hekma deal with the UAE, not structural reform alone, most immediately eased Egypt's foreign-exchange crisis, arriving just as Houthi attacks collapsed Suez Canal revenue.

From the opening:
“Egypt's economic improvement since 2024, reflected in faster growth, sharply lower inflation and rebuilt reserves, is often described as the payoff from a hard, IMF-backed reform program. Much of that improvement reflects genuine adjustment and reform.”

By Camilo Flora Matsumbo, Researcher and economic analyst, Mozambique

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/egypt-ras-el-hekma-suez-foreign-currency

#Geopolitics #Africa #MiddleEast #Egypt #UAE #Suez]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Africa</category>
    <category>Middle East &amp; North Africa</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The Cost of Partition: What the Subcontinent Lost in 1947</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/cost-of-partition-1947-south-asia-economy</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/cost-of-partition-1947-south-asia-economy</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dr Mukammil Shah Yousafzai</dc:creator>
    <description>What was the economic, political and social price of dividing an integrated subcontinent?</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/cost-of-partition-1947-south-asia-economy.jpg" length="345303" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/cost-of-partition-1947-south-asia-economy.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

THE COST OF PARTITION: WHAT THE SUBCONTINENT LOST IN 1947

Partition split India and Pakistan’s shared economy: jute from its mills, cotton from its looms, canals from their markets.

What was the economic, political and social price of dividing an integrated subcontinent?

From the opening:
“There are dates in history that create new countries, and there are dates that permanently alter the economic geography of a civilisation. 1947 was both. The Partition of British India created two new dominions, India and Pakistan, but it also cut through an economic system that had developed over centuries.”

By Dr Mukammil Shah Yousafzai, Director of Quality Assurance and HRD, Prime Group, Islamabad

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/cost-of-partition-1947-south-asia-economy

#Geopolitics #SouthAsia #India #Pakistan #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>South Asia</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Kazakhstan’s Agricultural Machinery Revolution</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/kazakhstan-agricultural-machinery-localisation</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/kazakhstan-agricultural-machinery-localisation</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jean-Davy Niezgoda</dc:creator>
    <description>How Astana Is Turning Foreign Competition into Industrial Power</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/kazakhstan-agricultural-machinery-localisation.jpg" length="245682" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/kazakhstan-agricultural-machinery-localisation.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

KAZAKHSTAN’S AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY REVOLUTION

Astana ties cheap finance to local assembly, drawing John Deere and Chinese and Turkish rivals into its industrial plan.

How Astana Is Turning Foreign Competition into Industrial Power

From the opening:
“For years, Kazakhstan was primarily known as an exporter of raw materials and agricultural commodities. That picture is changing. The country is now attempting to move up the value chain by attracting foreign manufacturers, localising production and using state-backed financing to modernise its agricultural sector.”

By Jean-Davy Niezgoda, International business and export specialist, France

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/kazakhstan-agricultural-machinery-localisation

#Geopolitics #China #Kazakhstan #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Indo-Pacific</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The Migration Management Trap: No Victims, No Criminals—Only Managers</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/migration-management-trap-tunisia-europe</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/migration-management-trap-tunisia-europe</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Saif Eddine Ghobr</dc:creator>
    <description>Migration is neither a threat nor a tragedy. It is a system of management—and everyone is a manager.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/migration-management-trap-tunisia-europe.jpg" length="207158" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/migration-management-trap-tunisia-europe.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

THE MIGRATION MANAGEMENT TRAP: NO VICTIMS, NO CRIMINALS—ONLY MANAGERS

Europe externalises its borders, Tunisia trades control for money and legitimacy, and the migrant becomes a currency.

Migration is neither a threat nor a tragedy. It is a system of management—and everyone is a manager.

From the opening:
“In Sfax, migrants from sub-Saharan Africa wait in informal settlements for a journey that may never happen. Some have tried to cross the Mediterranean and failed. Others were intercepted before departure.”

By Saif Eddine Ghobr, Founder, Tunisia Watch, Tunis

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/migration-management-trap-tunisia-europe

#Geopolitics #Africa #Europe #Tunisia #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Africa</category>
    <category>Europe</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The Global South&#x27;s Financial Alternative Isn&#x27;t the One With BRICS on the Door</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/global-south-financial-alternative-papss-brics</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/global-south-financial-alternative-papss-brics</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Camilo Flora Matsumbo</dc:creator>
    <description>Africa&#x27;s most consequential break from dependence on external financial intermediaries is not the BRICS-led New Development Bank, but the Pan-African Payment and Settlement System, a homegrown initiative moving money across African currencies without routing it through a third one.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/global-south-financial-alternative-papss-brics.jpg" length="217194" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/global-south-financial-alternative-papss-brics.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

The Global South's Financial Alternative Isn't the One With BRICS on the Door

Africa's fastest break from external financial intermediaries is a homegrown payment system, not the BRICS bank.

Africa's most consequential break from dependence on external financial intermediaries is not the BRICS-led New Development Bank, but the Pan-African Payment and Settlement System, a homegrown initiative moving money across African currencies without routing it through a third one.

From the opening:
“When African finance ministers talk about escaping the IMF and the World Bank, most of the international coverage points to BRICS: to the bloc's New Development Bank, to talk of de-dollarization, to a Johannesburg or Kazan summit communique.”

By Camilo Flora Matsumbo, Researcher and economic analyst, Mozambique

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/global-south-financial-alternative-papss-brics

#Geopolitics #Africa #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Africa</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>What If We Were Not Enemies?</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/pakistan-india-what-if-we-were-not-enemies</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/pakistan-india-what-if-we-were-not-enemies</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dr Mukammil Shah Yousafzai</dc:creator>
    <description>Pakistan and India: two neighbours spending too much energy on each other, while poverty waits at the door</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/pakistan-india-what-if-we-were-not-enemies.jpg" length="295843" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/pakistan-india-what-if-we-were-not-enemies.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New opinion on The Geopolitical Economist

WHAT IF WE WERE NOT ENEMIES?

A view from Peshawar: what Pakistan and India lose to hostility, and what trade and investment in people could gain.

Pakistan and India: two neighbours spending too much energy on each other, while poverty waits at the door

From the opening:
“Imagine a different South Asia. A Pakistani from Karachi, Lahore, Quetta, Islamabad or Peshawar sitting across a table from an Indian from Delhi, Mumbai or Kolkata not as an enemy, not as a proxy, not as a soldier, but as a businessman, researcher, teacher, doctor, engineer, student or neighbour.”

By Dr Mukammil Shah Yousafzai, Director of Quality Assurance and HRD, Prime Group, Islamabad

Read the full opinion: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/pakistan-india-what-if-we-were-not-enemies

#Geopolitics #SouthAsia #India #Pakistan #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>South Asia</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Why Gold Can Buy Political Distance and Garments Cannot</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-gold-can-buy-political-distance-and-garments-cannot</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-gold-can-buy-political-distance-and-garments-cannot</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Camilo Flora Matsumbo</dc:creator>
    <description>South Africa and Lesotho share a currency and a customs union, and absorbed the same American trade shock. The difference between their outcomes is not primarily about politics. It is about what each country sells, and how much of the value of those exports survives when the buyer changes.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/why-gold-can-buy-political-distance-and-garments-cannot.jpg" length="342759" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/why-gold-can-buy-political-distance-and-garments-cannot.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

WHY GOLD CAN BUY POLITICAL DISTANCE AND GARMENTS CANNOT

South Africa rode out US tariffs; Lesotho's garment trade collapsed. The difference is what travels with an export.

South Africa and Lesotho share a currency and a customs union, and absorbed the same American trade shock. The difference between their outcomes is not primarily about politics. It is about what each country sells, and how much of the value of those exports survives when the buyer changes.

From the opening:
“In August 2025, the United States imposed a 30% reciprocal tariff on South African goods and, through a combination of new duties and shifting exemptions, significantly eroded the commercial value of the country's preferential access under the African Growth and Opportunity Act.”

By Camilo Flora Matsumbo, Researcher and economic analyst, Mozambique

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-gold-can-buy-political-distance-and-garments-cannot

#Geopolitics #Africa #UnitedStates #Lesotho #SouthAfrica #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Africa</category>
    <category>Americas</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Nigeria&#x27;s Rating Upgrade Is Partly a War Dividend</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/nigeria-rating-upgrade-war-dividend</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/nigeria-rating-upgrade-war-dividend</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Camilo Flora Matsumbo</dc:creator>
    <description>Nigeria&#x27;s sovereign credit rating upgrade is being presented as proof that three years of painful reform have finally paid off. Some of it has. But part of the improvement traces back to an oil price spike tied to a war Nigeria did not start.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/nigeria-rating-upgrade-war-dividend.jpg" length="204689" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/nigeria-rating-upgrade-war-dividend.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

NIGERIA'S RATING UPGRADE IS PARTLY A WAR DIVIDEND

Three agencies upgraded Nigeria in thirteen months. How much reflects reform, and how much reflects a war-driven oil price?

Nigeria's sovereign credit rating upgrade is being presented as proof that three years of painful reform have finally paid off. Some of it has. But part of the improvement traces back to an oil price spike tied to a war Nigeria did not start.

From the opening:
“Nigeria's sovereign credit rating upgrade is being presented as proof that three years of painful reform have finally paid off. Some of it has.”

By Camilo Flora Matsumbo, Researcher and economic analyst, Mozambique

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/nigeria-rating-upgrade-war-dividend

#Geopolitics #Africa #Nigeria #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Africa</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Mozambique&#x27;s LNG Restart Is a Fiscal Bet on Timing</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/mozambique-lng-restart-fiscal-bet</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/mozambique-lng-restart-fiscal-bet</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Camilo Flora Matsumbo</dc:creator>
    <description>Mozambique&#x27;s delayed LNG restart could bring major gas revenues into state coffers just as a global supply wave reshapes prices, buyer leverage and the value of that revenue.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/mozambique-lng-restart-fiscal-bet.jpg" length="194201" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/mozambique-lng-restart-fiscal-bet.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

MOZAMBIQUE'S LNG RESTART IS A FISCAL BET ON TIMING

Mozambique's tax architecture defers most LNG revenue past 2030, just as a record supply wave reshapes global gas prices.

Mozambique's delayed LNG restart could bring major gas revenues into state coffers just as a global supply wave reshapes prices, buyer leverage and the value of that revenue.

From the opening:
“Mozambique's LNG restart is being described as the moment the country's long-delayed gas wealth finally comes within reach. But the fiscal question is more complicated. The state's own tax architecture, already visible in the project that is producing today, delays much of the expected revenue into the 2030s.”

By Camilo Flora Matsumbo, Researcher and economic analyst, Mozambique

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/mozambique-lng-restart-fiscal-bet

#Geopolitics #Africa #Mozambique #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Africa</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Mozambique&#x27;s Mining Law Is a Fiscal Bet on Resource Sovereignty</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/mozambique-mining-law-fiscal-bet</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/mozambique-mining-law-fiscal-bet</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Camilo Flora Matsumbo</dc:creator>
    <description>Mozambique&#x27;s 15% state mining stake could increase public control over mineral resources, but its success will depend on whether the country can attract the investment needed to turn that stake into actual revenue.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/mozambique-mining-law-fiscal-bet.jpg" length="219584" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/mozambique-mining-law-fiscal-bet.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

MOZAMBIQUE'S MINING LAW IS A FISCAL BET ON RESOURCE SOVEREIGNTY

A 15% state stake in every mine, demanded by a state whose external debt is 350% of national income.

Mozambique's 15% state mining stake could increase public control over mineral resources, but its success will depend on whether the country can attract the investment needed to turn that stake into actual revenue.

From the opening:
“Mozambique's new mining law is being presented as an assertion of greater control over the country's mineral resources. But control on paper is not the same as bargaining power in practice.”

By Camilo Flora Matsumbo, Researcher and economic analyst, Mozambique

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/mozambique-mining-law-fiscal-bet

#Geopolitics #Africa #Mozambique #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Africa</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Pakistan, Afghanistan Trade: From a Historic Lifeline to an Economic Deadlock</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/pakistan-afghanistan-trade-deadlock</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/pakistan-afghanistan-trade-deadlock</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dr Mukammil Shah Yousafzai</dc:creator>
    <description>When two neighbours close their doors, both sides pay the price.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/pakistan-afghanistan-trade-deadlock.jpg" length="236017" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/pakistan-afghanistan-trade-deadlock.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New briefing on The Geopolitical Economist

Pakistan, Afghanistan Trade: From a Historic Lifeline to an Economic Deadlock

Closed crossings cost Pakistan $177m a month and cut Afghan grape exports from 44,000 tonnes to 256.

When two neighbours close their doors, both sides pay the price.

From the opening:
“For decades, Pakistan and Afghanistan were connected not merely by a border but by a powerful economic artery. Karachi's ports provided Afghanistan with access to international markets, while Pakistani traders depended on Afghanistan for markets, transit business, fruits, vegetables, coal and other commodities.”

By Dr Mukammil Shah Yousafzai, Director of Quality Assurance and HRD, Prime Group, Islamabad

Read the full briefing: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/pakistan-afghanistan-trade-deadlock

#Geopolitics #SouthAsia #Pakistan #Afghanistan #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>South Asia</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Who Defines Tunisia&#x27;s Geopolitical Value? How Its Environment Shapes the State Itself</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/who-defines-tunisias-geopolitical-value</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/who-defines-tunisias-geopolitical-value</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Saif Eddine Ghobr</dc:creator>
    <description>Tunisia&#x27;s geopolitical value is not simply imposed by Europe, America or China. It is produced through an unequal exchange in which external demands reshape domestic incentives, and eventually the state itself.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/who-defines-tunisias-geopolitical-value.jpg" length="224586" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/who-defines-tunisias-geopolitical-value.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

Who Defines Tunisia's Geopolitical Value? How Its Environment Shapes the State Itself

Tunisia's strategic position earns it money and attention. A study of who captures that value, and what it does to the state.

Tunisia's geopolitical value is not simply imposed by Europe, America or China. It is produced through an unequal exchange in which external demands reshape domestic incentives, and eventually the state itself.

From the opening:
“Tunisia occupies a strategic position at the intersection of the Mediterranean, North Africa and the wider Arab world. It borders Algeria and Libya and sits close to Europe. Geography therefore gives Tunisia geopolitical value. But geography alone does not determine who captures that value.”

By Saif Eddine Ghobr, Founder, Tunisia Watch, Tunis

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/who-defines-tunisias-geopolitical-value

#Geopolitics #Africa #Europe #UnitedStates #China #Tunisia]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Africa</category>
    <category>Europe</category>
    <category>Americas</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Bangladesh&#x27;s BRICS Absence Was About More Than Protocol</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/bangladesh-brics-absence-was-about-more-than-protocol</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/bangladesh-brics-absence-was-about-more-than-protocol</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Kawsar Mia and Dr. Abdul Momen</dc:creator>
    <description>Dhaka&#x27;s no-show in New Delhi exposed a narrowing strategic space between BRICS-style financial autonomy and new U.S.-linked economic-security commitments.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/bangladesh-brics-absence-was-about-more-than-protocol.jpg" length="255400" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/bangladesh-brics-absence-was-about-more-than-protocol.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

BANGLADESH'S BRICS ABSENCE WAS ABOUT MORE THAN PROTOCOL

Dhaka's no-show in New Delhi was read as a protocol dispute. The trade agreement it signed in February explains more.

From the opening:
“Bangladesh's decision to stay away from the 18th BRICS Summit in New Delhi should not be read as proof that Dhaka has chosen Washington over BRICS.”

By Kawsar Mia and Dr. Abdul Momen

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/bangladesh-brics-absence-was-about-more-than-protocol

#Geopolitics #SouthAsia #UnitedStates #China #Bangladesh #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>South Asia</category>
    <category>Americas</category>
    <category>Indo-Pacific</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Why India and China Secretly Want the Dollar to Survive</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-india-and-china-secretly-want-the-dollar-to-survive</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-india-and-china-secretly-want-the-dollar-to-survive</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>The bloc&#x27;s two biggest economies hold trillions in dollar assets, and their rivalry makes a shared alternative even less likely.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/why-india-and-china-secretly-want-the-dollar-to-survive.jpg" length="161473" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/why-india-and-china-secretly-want-the-dollar-to-survive.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

WHY INDIA AND CHINA SECRETLY WANT THE DOLLAR TO SURVIVE

The bloc's two biggest economies hold trillions in dollar assets, and their rivalry makes a shared alternative even less likely.

From the opening:
“Vladimir Putin landed in New Delhi this morning. Xi Jinping arrives tomorrow, his first visit to India since 2019. Iran's Masoud Pezeshkian flies in from a country at war.”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-india-and-china-secretly-want-the-dollar-to-survive

#Geopolitics #China #SouthAsia #UnitedStates #India #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Indo-Pacific</category>
    <category>South Asia</category>
    <category>Americas</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>America Is Bombing Its Own Bond Market</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/america-is-bombing-its-own-bond-market</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/america-is-bombing-its-own-bond-market</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>Five Iranian tankers are burning, oil has crossed $100, and the U.S. Treasury is paying more than $1 trillion a year in interest. These three facts are one story.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/america-is-bombing-its-own-bond-market.jpg" length="156749" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/america-is-bombing-its-own-bond-market.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

AMERICA IS BOMBING ITS OWN BOND MARKET

Five Iranian tankers are burning, oil has crossed $100, and the U.S. Treasury is paying more than $1 trillion a year in interest. These three facts are one story.

From the opening:
“On Tuesday night the United States destroyed five Iranian oil tankers, the Kaviz, Charminar, Horizon 1, Riesco and Derya, in the Gulf of Oman and off Kharg Island. Iran answered within hours.”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/america-is-bombing-its-own-bond-market

#Geopolitics #MiddleEast #UnitedStates #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Middle East &amp; North Africa</category>
    <category>Americas</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The Biggest El Niño Since 1877 Could Hit Harder</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/biggest-el-nino-since-1877</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/biggest-el-nino-since-1877</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>This time, we have 18 months’ warning — and still no plan.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/biggest-el-nino-since-1877.jpg" length="172773" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/biggest-el-nino-since-1877.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

THE BIGGEST EL NIÑO SINCE 1877 COULD HIT HARDER

This time, we have 18 months’ warning — and still no plan.

From the opening:
“W hat you are looking at is not a model output but a measurement. Water expands as it warms, so a satellite that reads sea-surface height to within centimetres is also, indirectly, a thermometer for the upper ocean.”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/biggest-el-nino-since-1877

#Geopolitics #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>When Will America’s Economic Doomsday Actually Hit?</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/americas-economic-doomsday</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/americas-economic-doomsday</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>There are five things that have to happen first — and two of them happened this week.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/americas-economic-doomsday.jpg" length="337618" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/americas-economic-doomsday.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

WHEN WILL AMERICA’S ECONOMIC DOOMSDAY ACTUALLY HIT?

There are five things that have to happen first — and two of them happened this week.

From the opening:
“On Wednesday, 19 August, the debt of the United States crossed $40.047 trillion. Two days later, the Treasury Secretary went on television and said something that most people took as a denial, but which is actually correct.”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/americas-economic-doomsday

#Geopolitics #UnitedStates #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Americas</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Iran Is Waiting for the US Midterm Elections</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/iran-waiting-for-midterms</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/iran-waiting-for-midterms</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>In 1980, It Waited for the American Election, and It Is Waiting Again.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/iran-waiting-for-midterms.jpg" length="166404" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/iran-waiting-for-midterms.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

IRAN IS WAITING FOR THE US MIDTERM ELECTIONS

In 1980, It Waited for the American Election, and It Is Waiting Again.

From the opening:
“On Monday, Trump said his administration had opened a back channel to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The IRGC denied it. On Tuesday, Trump posted this: The Strait is not, in any commercially meaningful sense, open and operating.”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/iran-waiting-for-midterms

#Geopolitics #MiddleEast #UnitedStates #Iran #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Middle East &amp; North Africa</category>
    <category>Americas</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>How Far Can Europe Go for Ukraine?</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/how-far-can-europe-go-for-ukraine</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/how-far-can-europe-go-for-ukraine</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>Europe has become Ukraine’s biggest financial backer. The real question is whether Europe’s own economy can survive the cost.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/how-far-can-europe-go-for-ukraine.jpg" length="190657" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/how-far-can-europe-go-for-ukraine.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

HOW FAR CAN EUROPE GO FOR UKRAINE?

Europe has become Ukraine’s biggest financial backer. The real question is whether Europe’s own economy can survive the cost.

From the opening:
“This week, the Ukraine Recovery Conference wrapped up in Gdańsk, Poland. Five thousand participants from 70 countries. 160 deals worth €10 billion signed. The EU handed over the first €3.2 billion tranche of its massive new loan package.”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/how-far-can-europe-go-for-ukraine

#Geopolitics #Europe #Russia #Ukraine #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Europe</category>
    <category>Russia &amp; Eurasia</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The Crash Will Begin in America and Hit the Entire World</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/the-crash-will-begin-in-america</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/the-crash-will-begin-in-america</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>Much Worse Than 1929, 2000, and 2008</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/the-crash-will-begin-in-america.jpg" length="328341" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/the-crash-will-begin-in-america.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

THE CRASH WILL BEGIN IN AMERICA AND HIT THE ENTIRE WORLD

Much Worse Than 1929, 2000, and 2008

From the opening:
“We are living in the most volatile period of the 21st century. Something big is unfolding in front of our eyes. Power is shifting, old institutions are weakening, and the systems that once guaranteed stability are no longer trusted the way they used to be.”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/the-crash-will-begin-in-america

#Geopolitics #UnitedStates #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Americas</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Russia’s War Economy Is Finally Breaking Apart</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/russias-war-economy-breaking-apart</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/russias-war-economy-breaking-apart</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2025 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>The Illusion of Strength Is Fading</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/russias-war-economy-breaking-apart.jpg" length="272969" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/russias-war-economy-breaking-apart.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

RUSSIA’S WAR ECONOMY IS FINALLY BREAKING APART

The Illusion of Strength Is Fading

From the opening:
“For the last three years, Russia has avoiding its economic collapse despite the toughest Western sanctions since the war began, factories kept running, the ruble stayed stable, and its GDP even grew faster than some EU countries.”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/russias-war-economy-breaking-apart

#Geopolitics #Russia #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Russia &amp; Eurasia</category>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>
