<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
  <title>The Geopolitical Economist · Indo-Pacific</title>
  <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/topics/china</link>
  <atom:link href="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/topics/china.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
  <description>China, Taiwan, Japan, Korea, South-East Asia and the contest for Asia.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  
  <item>
    <title>Three Myths the West Gets Wrong About CPEC</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/three-myths-the-west-gets-wrong-about-cpec</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/three-myths-the-west-gets-wrong-about-cpec</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Laiba Afzal</dc:creator>
    <description>Beyond the headlines: why calling a $62 billion trade corridor a &quot;debt trap&quot; misses what is actually happening on the ground.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/three-myths-the-west-gets-wrong-about-cpec.jpg" length="157768" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/three-myths-the-west-gets-wrong-about-cpec.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New opinion on The Geopolitical Economist

THREE MYTHS THE WEST GETS WRONG ABOUT CPEC

Calling the $62 billion China-Pakistan Economic Corridor a debt trap misses who holds Pakistan's debt, what Gwadar is for and who actually decides.

Beyond the headlines: why calling a $62 billion trade corridor a "debt trap" misses what is actually happening on the ground.

From the opening:
“Western coverage of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor follows a remarkably predictable script. Predatory loans. Hidden military bases. A total loss of local sovereignty. It makes for dramatic news. It fits neatly into black and white Cold War tropes. The problem? It completely misreads modern geoeconomics.”

By Laiba Afzal, MPhil candidate in International Relations, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad

Read the full opinion: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/three-myths-the-west-gets-wrong-about-cpec

#Geopolitics #SouthAsia #China #Pakistan #Gwadar #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>South Asia</category>
    <category>Indo-Pacific</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The G20 Common Framework Fixed Who Sits at the Table. It Never Fixed the Clock.</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/g20-common-framework-fixed-the-table-not-the-clock</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/g20-common-framework-fixed-the-table-not-the-clock</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Camilo Flora Matsumbo</dc:creator>
    <description>The Common Framework brought China and the Paris Club into one restructuring process for the first time. It left the timeline open-ended, and the IMF and World Bank have since called the missing standstill and deadline design gaps. The delay, not the generosity of each settlement, has been its most underpriced cost.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/g20-common-framework-fixed-the-table-not-the-clock.jpg" length="320820" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/g20-common-framework-fixed-the-table-not-the-clock.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

The G20 Common Framework Fixed Who Sits at the Table. It Never Fixed the Clock.

Chad, Zambia, Ghana and Ethiopia waited one to three years for restructuring under the G20 Common Framework. The delay, not the terms, is its biggest cost.

The Common Framework brought China and the Paris Club into one restructuring process for the first time. It left the timeline open-ended, and the IMF and World Bank have since called the missing standstill and deadline design gaps. The delay, not the generosity of each settlement, has been its most underpriced cost.

From the opening:
“Nearly six years after the Group of Twenty created the Common Framework for Debt Treatment in November 2020, the mechanism has produced a real and underappreciated achievement: for the first time, it placed the Paris Club of traditional bilateral creditors and China, now the largest single bilateral creditor to many…”

By Camilo Flora Matsumbo, Researcher and economic analyst, Mozambique

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/g20-common-framework-fixed-the-table-not-the-clock

#Geopolitics #Africa #China #Zambia #Ghana #Ethiopia]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Africa</category>
    <category>Indo-Pacific</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Kazakhstan’s Agricultural Machinery Revolution</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/kazakhstan-agricultural-machinery-localisation</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/kazakhstan-agricultural-machinery-localisation</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jean-Davy Niezgoda</dc:creator>
    <description>How Astana Is Turning Foreign Competition into Industrial Power</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/kazakhstan-agricultural-machinery-localisation.jpg" length="245682" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/kazakhstan-agricultural-machinery-localisation.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

KAZAKHSTAN’S AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY REVOLUTION

Astana ties cheap finance to local assembly, drawing John Deere and Chinese and Turkish rivals into its industrial plan.

How Astana Is Turning Foreign Competition into Industrial Power

From the opening:
“For years, Kazakhstan was primarily known as an exporter of raw materials and agricultural commodities. That picture is changing. The country is now attempting to move up the value chain by attracting foreign manufacturers, localising production and using state-backed financing to modernise its agricultural sector.”

By Jean-Davy Niezgoda, International business and export specialist, France

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/kazakhstan-agricultural-machinery-localisation

#Geopolitics #China #Kazakhstan #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Indo-Pacific</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Why China Will Get What It Wants From Trump</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-china-will-get-what-it-wants-from-trump</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-china-will-get-what-it-wants-from-trump</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>Xi arrives in Washington with rare earths, cheap energy, and leverage. Trump arrives with $6 diesel and a war he can&#x27;t afford.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/why-china-will-get-what-it-wants-from-trump.jpg" length="216555" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/why-china-will-get-what-it-wants-from-trump.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

WHY CHINA WILL GET WHAT IT WANTS FROM TRUMP

Xi arrives with rare earths, cheap energy, and leverage. Trump arrives with $6 diesel and a war. Who needs this deal more?

From the opening:
“Xi Jinping lands at Joint Base Andrews tomorrow for a three-day summit that the White House is framing as a meeting of equals. It is not.”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-china-will-get-what-it-wants-from-trump

#Geopolitics #UnitedStates #China #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Americas</category>
    <category>Indo-Pacific</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Bangladesh&#x27;s BRICS Absence Was About More Than Protocol</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/bangladesh-brics-absence-was-about-more-than-protocol</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/bangladesh-brics-absence-was-about-more-than-protocol</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Kawsar Mia and Dr. Abdul Momen</dc:creator>
    <description>Dhaka&#x27;s no-show in New Delhi exposed a narrowing strategic space between BRICS-style financial autonomy and new U.S.-linked economic-security commitments.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/bangladesh-brics-absence-was-about-more-than-protocol.jpg" length="255400" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/bangladesh-brics-absence-was-about-more-than-protocol.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

BANGLADESH'S BRICS ABSENCE WAS ABOUT MORE THAN PROTOCOL

Dhaka's no-show in New Delhi was read as a protocol dispute. The trade agreement it signed in February explains more.

From the opening:
“Bangladesh's decision to stay away from the 18th BRICS Summit in New Delhi should not be read as proof that Dhaka has chosen Washington over BRICS.”

By Kawsar Mia and Dr. Abdul Momen

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/bangladesh-brics-absence-was-about-more-than-protocol

#Geopolitics #SouthAsia #UnitedStates #China #Bangladesh #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>South Asia</category>
    <category>Americas</category>
    <category>Indo-Pacific</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Why India and China Secretly Want the Dollar to Survive</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-india-and-china-secretly-want-the-dollar-to-survive</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-india-and-china-secretly-want-the-dollar-to-survive</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>The bloc&#x27;s two biggest economies hold trillions in dollar assets, and their rivalry makes a shared alternative even less likely.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/why-india-and-china-secretly-want-the-dollar-to-survive.jpg" length="161473" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/why-india-and-china-secretly-want-the-dollar-to-survive.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

WHY INDIA AND CHINA SECRETLY WANT THE DOLLAR TO SURVIVE

The bloc's two biggest economies hold trillions in dollar assets, and their rivalry makes a shared alternative even less likely.

From the opening:
“Vladimir Putin landed in New Delhi this morning. Xi Jinping arrives tomorrow, his first visit to India since 2019. Iran's Masoud Pezeshkian flies in from a country at war.”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-india-and-china-secretly-want-the-dollar-to-survive

#Geopolitics #China #SouthAsia #UnitedStates #India #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Indo-Pacific</category>
    <category>South Asia</category>
    <category>Americas</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Europe Is Becoming a Chinese Colony</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/europe-is-becoming-a-chinese-colony</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/europe-is-becoming-a-chinese-colony</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>How Europe’s trade imbalance with China is becoming a vulnerability for jobs, manufacturing, and security.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/europe-is-becoming-a-chinese-colony.jpg" length="261775" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/europe-is-becoming-a-chinese-colony.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

EUROPE IS BECOMING A CHINESE COLONY

How Europe’s trade imbalance with China is becoming a vulnerability for jobs, manufacturing, and security.

From the opening:
“This is not something unique, but it’s the now the relatity that the EU is facing right now, and again, this phrase is not used by me at all, it's been used by the European news outlet”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/europe-is-becoming-a-chinese-colony

#Geopolitics #Europe #China #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Europe</category>
    <category>Indo-Pacific</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>China Won’t Invade Taiwan. It Will Quarantine It.</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/china-wont-invade-taiwan</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/china-wont-invade-taiwan</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>A blockade is an act of war. A quarantine is paperwork</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/china-wont-invade-taiwan.jpg" length="248323" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/china-wont-invade-taiwan.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

CHINA WON’T INVADE TAIWAN. IT WILL QUARANTINE IT.

A blockade is an act of war. A quarantine is paperwork

From the opening:
“China has played a very clever move. There is an announcement from Beijing that ships bound for the Taiwanese port of Kaohsiung must now file their cargo paperwork with Chinese authorities 48 hours in advance.”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/china-wont-invade-taiwan

#Geopolitics #China #Taiwan #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Indo-Pacific</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Trump Doesn’t Want Money From His Allies. He Wants Their Soldiers.</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/trump-wants-their-soldiers</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/trump-wants-their-soldiers</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>South Korea pay the price of the US security guaranty</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/trump-wants-their-soldiers.jpg" length="169774" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/trump-wants-their-soldiers.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

TRUMP DOESN’T WANT MONEY FROM HIS ALLIES. HE WANTS THEIR SOLDIERS.

South Korea pay the price of the US security guaranty

From the opening:
“As you know, since Trump started the war in Iran, he is arguing that it’s not merely an American conflict, but a global conflict for which the allies in Europe step forward and join the United States.”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/trump-wants-their-soldiers

#Geopolitics #UnitedStates #China #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Americas</category>
    <category>Indo-Pacific</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>China’s Water Bomb Has Exploded in Nepal — and the World Is Silent</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/chinas-water-bomb-nepal</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/chinas-water-bomb-nepal</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>Climate change broke the mountain, but China’s upstream secrecy and the world’s silence turned disaster into catastrophe.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/chinas-water-bomb-nepal.jpg" length="317028" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/chinas-water-bomb-nepal.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

CHINA’S WATER BOMB HAS EXPLODED IN NEPAL — AND THE WORLD IS SILENT

Climate change broke the mountain, but China’s upstream secrecy and the world’s silence turned disaster into catastrophe.

From the opening:
“903 dead. 4,247 missing. 933 workers sealed inside hydropower tunnels. This is obviously a climate-change catastrophe. But in the international media, almost no one is asking what China’s construction across the Tibetan Plateau has to do with it.”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/chinas-water-bomb-nepal

#Geopolitics #SouthAsia #China #Nepal #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>South Asia</category>
    <category>Indo-Pacific</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The End of the Liberal International Order? What Comes Next, We Still Do Not Know</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/end-of-the-liberal-international-order-interregnum</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/end-of-the-liberal-international-order-interregnum</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>The liberal international order is widely held to be breaking apart, yet scholars disagree about what is breaking, when the breakdown began, and what will take its place.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/end-of-the-liberal-international-order-interregnum.jpg" length="290193" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/end-of-the-liberal-international-order-interregnum.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New research paper on The Geopolitical Economist

The End of the Liberal International Order? What Comes Next, We Still Do Not Know

The liberal international order is in terminal decline, with no single cause, no single date and no successor yet in sight. A research paper on the interregnum.

From the opening:
“The liberal international order is widely held to be breaking apart, yet scholars disagree about what is breaking, when the breakdown began, and what will take its place.”

By Vikas

Read the full research paper: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/end-of-the-liberal-international-order-interregnum

#Geopolitics #UnitedStates #China #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Americas</category>
    <category>Indo-Pacific</category>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>
