<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
  <title>The Geopolitical Economist · South Asia</title>
  <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/topics/south-asia</link>
  <atom:link href="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/topics/south-asia.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
  <description>India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Nepal and the Himalayan frontier.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  
  <item>
    <title>Three Myths the West Gets Wrong About CPEC</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/three-myths-the-west-gets-wrong-about-cpec</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/three-myths-the-west-gets-wrong-about-cpec</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Laiba Afzal</dc:creator>
    <description>Beyond the headlines: why calling a $62 billion trade corridor a &quot;debt trap&quot; misses what is actually happening on the ground.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/three-myths-the-west-gets-wrong-about-cpec.jpg" length="157768" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/three-myths-the-west-gets-wrong-about-cpec.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New opinion on The Geopolitical Economist

THREE MYTHS THE WEST GETS WRONG ABOUT CPEC

Calling the $62 billion China-Pakistan Economic Corridor a debt trap misses who holds Pakistan's debt, what Gwadar is for and who actually decides.

Beyond the headlines: why calling a $62 billion trade corridor a "debt trap" misses what is actually happening on the ground.

From the opening:
“Western coverage of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor follows a remarkably predictable script. Predatory loans. Hidden military bases. A total loss of local sovereignty. It makes for dramatic news. It fits neatly into black and white Cold War tropes. The problem? It completely misreads modern geoeconomics.”

By Laiba Afzal, MPhil candidate in International Relations, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad

Read the full opinion: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/three-myths-the-west-gets-wrong-about-cpec

#Geopolitics #SouthAsia #China #Pakistan #Gwadar #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>South Asia</category>
    <category>Indo-Pacific</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>What Indians Are Protesting About. It Isn&#x27;t Prices.</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/what-indians-protest-about-exams-not-prices</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/what-indians-protest-about-exams-not-prices</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>Part 2 of The Protest Question. The grievance behind India&#x27;s record protest count is the state&#x27;s failing examination and hiring machine, not the cost of living. The data shows where the pain is, when it erupts, and what companies operating in India should read into it.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/what-indians-protest-about-exams-not-prices.jpg" length="153620" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/what-indians-protest-about-exams-not-prices.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New research brief on The Geopolitical Economist

WHAT INDIANS ARE PROTESTING ABOUT. IT ISN'T PRICES.

Exams and jobs, not inflation, drive India's rising protest count. The grievance data, the calendar, the states, and what it means for business.

Part 2 of The Protest Question. The grievance behind India's record protest count is the state's failing examination and hiring machine, not the cost of living. The data shows where the pain is, when it erupts, and what companies operating in India should read into it.

From the opening:
“Part 1 of this series established that Indians are protesting more: about half as many demonstrations again as a decade ago, a record in 2024, a higher one coming in 2026, and less violence, not more. It did not say why.”

By Vikas

Read the full research brief: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/what-indians-protest-about-exams-not-prices

#Geopolitics #SouthAsia #India #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>South Asia</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Are Indians Protesting More? Yes. Here Is the Evidence.</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/are-indians-protesting-more</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/are-indians-protesting-more</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>Every count of protests that exists for India points the same way. The ACLED event record shows demonstrations up by half since 2016 and at a record in 2024 to 2026. The police&#x27;s own count of agitations was rising before that. A catalogue of 217 major protests since 2000 shows the rate doubling since the late 2010s. The protests are also more peaceful than a decade ago. What has fallen is rioting, which is a different thing.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/are-indians-protesting-more.jpg" length="180620" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/are-indians-protesting-more.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New research brief on The Geopolitical Economist

ARE INDIANS PROTESTING MORE? YES. HERE IS THE EVIDENCE.

Every count of protests in India points the same way: up. ACLED records half as many again as in 2016, the police's own agitation counts rose before that, and 2024 to 2026 are the busiest years on record. Part 1 of a research series.

From the opening:
“This is the first part of a research series on protest in India. The series asks who is protesting, why now, who pays and who amplifies, and how much of it is engineered. Before any of that can be asked, one question has to be answered with numbers rather than impressions: are Indians protesting more than they used to?”

By Vikas

Read the full research brief: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/are-indians-protesting-more

#Geopolitics #SouthAsia #India #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>South Asia</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Afghanistan After NATO: When the Balloon Economy Lost Its Air</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/afghanistan-after-nato-balloon-economy</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/afghanistan-after-nato-balloon-economy</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dr Mukammil Shah Yousafzai</dc:creator>
    <description>From the pre-9/11 battlefield to two decades of foreign-funded state-building — and now a search for economic survival</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/afghanistan-after-nato-balloon-economy.jpg" length="117738" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/afghanistan-after-nato-balloon-economy.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

AFGHANISTAN AFTER NATO: WHEN THE BALLOON ECONOMY LOST ITS AIR

Two decades of foreign money built a state in Afghanistan. When NATO left, it collapsed. Dr Mukammil Shah Yousafzai on what comes next.

From the pre-9/11 battlefield to two decades of foreign-funded state-building — and now a search for economic survival

From the opening:
“Afghanistan has always been more than a country on a map. It has been a meeting point of empires, civilizations, trade routes and competing geopolitical ambitions. Yet few periods transformed it as profoundly as the quarter-century following September 11, 2001.”

By Dr Mukammil Shah Yousafzai, Director of Quality Assurance and HRD, Prime Group, Islamabad

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/afghanistan-after-nato-balloon-economy

#Geopolitics #SouthAsia #Afghanistan #NATO #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>South Asia</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Why AI Power Will Be Claimed in the Next Thirty Months, and by Whom</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/ai-power-next-thirty-months-india-russia-witness</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/ai-power-next-thirty-months-india-russia-witness</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dr Yashwant Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>India and Russia cannot win the race for capacity. They can contest the race for standing, and standing has a shorter clock.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/ai-power-next-thirty-months-india-russia-witness.jpg" length="244864" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/ai-power-next-thirty-months-india-russia-witness.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

WHY AI POWER WILL BE CLAIMED IN THE NEXT THIRTY MONTHS, AND BY WHOM

India and Russia cannot win the race for AI capacity. They can contest the race for standing, and India can be the witness.

From the opening:
“Most talk of AI power counts assets: chips, clusters, parameters, capital. On that count India and Russia will trail Washington and Beijing for years. But counting assets mistakes the nature of the contest.”

By Dr Yashwant Singh, Assistant Professor of Sociology, GITAM University, Bengaluru

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/ai-power-next-thirty-months-india-russia-witness

#Geopolitics #SouthAsia #Russia #India #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>South Asia</category>
    <category>Russia &amp; Eurasia</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The Cost of Partition: What the Subcontinent Lost in 1947</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/cost-of-partition-1947-south-asia-economy</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/cost-of-partition-1947-south-asia-economy</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dr Mukammil Shah Yousafzai</dc:creator>
    <description>What was the economic, political and social price of dividing an integrated subcontinent?</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/cost-of-partition-1947-south-asia-economy.jpg" length="345303" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/cost-of-partition-1947-south-asia-economy.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

THE COST OF PARTITION: WHAT THE SUBCONTINENT LOST IN 1947

Partition split India and Pakistan’s shared economy: jute from its mills, cotton from its looms, canals from their markets.

What was the economic, political and social price of dividing an integrated subcontinent?

From the opening:
“There are dates in history that create new countries, and there are dates that permanently alter the economic geography of a civilisation. 1947 was both. The Partition of British India created two new dominions, India and Pakistan, but it also cut through an economic system that had developed over centuries.”

By Dr Mukammil Shah Yousafzai, Director of Quality Assurance and HRD, Prime Group, Islamabad

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/cost-of-partition-1947-south-asia-economy

#Geopolitics #SouthAsia #India #Pakistan #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>South Asia</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>What If We Were Not Enemies?</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/pakistan-india-what-if-we-were-not-enemies</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/pakistan-india-what-if-we-were-not-enemies</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dr Mukammil Shah Yousafzai</dc:creator>
    <description>Pakistan and India: two neighbours spending too much energy on each other, while poverty waits at the door</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/pakistan-india-what-if-we-were-not-enemies.jpg" length="295843" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/pakistan-india-what-if-we-were-not-enemies.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New opinion on The Geopolitical Economist

WHAT IF WE WERE NOT ENEMIES?

A view from Peshawar: what Pakistan and India lose to hostility, and what trade and investment in people could gain.

Pakistan and India: two neighbours spending too much energy on each other, while poverty waits at the door

From the opening:
“Imagine a different South Asia. A Pakistani from Karachi, Lahore, Quetta, Islamabad or Peshawar sitting across a table from an Indian from Delhi, Mumbai or Kolkata not as an enemy, not as a proxy, not as a soldier, but as a businessman, researcher, teacher, doctor, engineer, student or neighbour.”

By Dr Mukammil Shah Yousafzai, Director of Quality Assurance and HRD, Prime Group, Islamabad

Read the full opinion: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/pakistan-india-what-if-we-were-not-enemies

#Geopolitics #SouthAsia #India #Pakistan #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>South Asia</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Grid, Factory, and the Shared Sovereignty Problem: India-Israel Convergence in Electrical, Automation, and Robotics Technology</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/india-israel-shared-sovereignty-problem</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/india-israel-shared-sovereignty-problem</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dr Yashwant Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>India&#x27;s manufacturing scale without design-and-verification depth, and Israel&#x27;s design-and-verification depth without manufacturing scale, are mirror-image versions of the same incomplete sovereignty position. Converging them is not merely good industrial policy.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/india-israel-shared-sovereignty-problem.jpg" length="265470" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/india-israel-shared-sovereignty-problem.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

Grid, Factory, and the Shared Sovereignty Problem: India-Israel Convergence in Electrical, Automation, and Robotics Technology

India's manufacturing scale without design depth, and Israel's design depth without scale, are the same incomplete sovereignty. A case for convergence.

From the opening:
“Two essays, read separately, describe two different anxieties. One, "India's Power Grid and the AI-Era Sovereignty Problem" (September 18, 2026), is about the electricity grid becoming a cyber-physical system whose real vulnerability lies not in foreign hardware but in who controls its firmware, patches, and failure…”

By Dr Yashwant Singh, Assistant Professor of Sociology, GITAM University, Bengaluru

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/india-israel-shared-sovereignty-problem

#Geopolitics #SouthAsia #MiddleEast #India #Israel #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>South Asia</category>
    <category>Middle East &amp; North Africa</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Pakistan, Afghanistan Trade: From a Historic Lifeline to an Economic Deadlock</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/pakistan-afghanistan-trade-deadlock</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/pakistan-afghanistan-trade-deadlock</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dr Mukammil Shah Yousafzai</dc:creator>
    <description>When two neighbours close their doors, both sides pay the price.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/pakistan-afghanistan-trade-deadlock.jpg" length="236017" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/pakistan-afghanistan-trade-deadlock.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New briefing on The Geopolitical Economist

Pakistan, Afghanistan Trade: From a Historic Lifeline to an Economic Deadlock

Closed crossings cost Pakistan $177m a month and cut Afghan grape exports from 44,000 tonnes to 256.

When two neighbours close their doors, both sides pay the price.

From the opening:
“For decades, Pakistan and Afghanistan were connected not merely by a border but by a powerful economic artery. Karachi's ports provided Afghanistan with access to international markets, while Pakistani traders depended on Afghanistan for markets, transit business, fruits, vegetables, coal and other commodities.”

By Dr Mukammil Shah Yousafzai, Director of Quality Assurance and HRD, Prime Group, Islamabad

Read the full briefing: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/pakistan-afghanistan-trade-deadlock

#Geopolitics #SouthAsia #Pakistan #Afghanistan #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>South Asia</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Bangladesh&#x27;s BRICS Absence Was About More Than Protocol</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/bangladesh-brics-absence-was-about-more-than-protocol</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/bangladesh-brics-absence-was-about-more-than-protocol</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Kawsar Mia and Dr. Abdul Momen</dc:creator>
    <description>Dhaka&#x27;s no-show in New Delhi exposed a narrowing strategic space between BRICS-style financial autonomy and new U.S.-linked economic-security commitments.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/bangladesh-brics-absence-was-about-more-than-protocol.jpg" length="255400" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/bangladesh-brics-absence-was-about-more-than-protocol.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

BANGLADESH'S BRICS ABSENCE WAS ABOUT MORE THAN PROTOCOL

Dhaka's no-show in New Delhi was read as a protocol dispute. The trade agreement it signed in February explains more.

From the opening:
“Bangladesh's decision to stay away from the 18th BRICS Summit in New Delhi should not be read as proof that Dhaka has chosen Washington over BRICS.”

By Kawsar Mia and Dr. Abdul Momen

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/bangladesh-brics-absence-was-about-more-than-protocol

#Geopolitics #SouthAsia #UnitedStates #China #Bangladesh #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>South Asia</category>
    <category>Americas</category>
    <category>Indo-Pacific</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Why India and China Secretly Want the Dollar to Survive</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-india-and-china-secretly-want-the-dollar-to-survive</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-india-and-china-secretly-want-the-dollar-to-survive</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>The bloc&#x27;s two biggest economies hold trillions in dollar assets, and their rivalry makes a shared alternative even less likely.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/why-india-and-china-secretly-want-the-dollar-to-survive.jpg" length="161473" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/why-india-and-china-secretly-want-the-dollar-to-survive.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

WHY INDIA AND CHINA SECRETLY WANT THE DOLLAR TO SURVIVE

The bloc's two biggest economies hold trillions in dollar assets, and their rivalry makes a shared alternative even less likely.

From the opening:
“Vladimir Putin landed in New Delhi this morning. Xi Jinping arrives tomorrow, his first visit to India since 2019. Iran's Masoud Pezeshkian flies in from a country at war.”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/why-india-and-china-secretly-want-the-dollar-to-survive

#Geopolitics #China #SouthAsia #UnitedStates #India #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>Indo-Pacific</category>
    <category>South Asia</category>
    <category>Americas</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>China’s Water Bomb Has Exploded in Nepal — and the World Is Silent</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/chinas-water-bomb-nepal</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/chinas-water-bomb-nepal</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>Climate change broke the mountain, but China’s upstream secrecy and the world’s silence turned disaster into catastrophe.</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/chinas-water-bomb-nepal.jpg" length="317028" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/chinas-water-bomb-nepal.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

CHINA’S WATER BOMB HAS EXPLODED IN NEPAL — AND THE WORLD IS SILENT

Climate change broke the mountain, but China’s upstream secrecy and the world’s silence turned disaster into catastrophe.

From the opening:
“903 dead. 4,247 missing. 933 workers sealed inside hydropower tunnels. This is obviously a climate-change catastrophe. But in the international media, almost no one is asking what China’s construction across the Tibetan Plateau has to do with it.”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/chinas-water-bomb-nepal

#Geopolitics #SouthAsia #China #Nepal #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>South Asia</category>
    <category>Indo-Pacific</category>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>India-Pakistan: The Next Major War?</title>
    <link>https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/india-pakistan-the-next-major-war</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/india-pakistan-the-next-major-war</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
    <description>5 ways India can respond to the terrorist attack by Pakistan</description>
    <enclosure url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/india-pakistan-the-next-major-war.jpg" length="260957" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <media:content url="https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/assets/img/cards/india-pakistan-the-next-major-war.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[New analysis on The Geopolitical Economist

INDIA-PAKISTAN: THE NEXT MAJOR WAR?

5 ways India can respond to the terrorist attack by Pakistan

From the opening:
“The thing that was started by the Pakistan-backed terrorist attack can be turned into a small-scale war between both nations The terrorists killed the unarmed Indian tourists — families, honeymooners, kids — who were attacked by terrorists in one of the most heartbreaking incidents we’ve seen in recent times.”

By Vikas

Read the full analysis: https://geopoliticaleconomist.com/articles/india-pakistan-the-next-major-war

#Geopolitics #SouthAsia #India #Pakistan #GlobalEconomy]]></content:encoded>
    <category>South Asia</category>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>
